-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
Insights: WebAssembly/component-model
Overview
Could not load contribution data
Please try again later
2 Pull requests merged by 2 people
-
Fix WIT.md example
#493 merged
Apr 8, 2025 -
Separately gate
error-context
from async#489 merged
Apr 3, 2025
2 Pull requests opened by 1 person
-
Restrict 'strongly-unique' predicate to prevent further bindgen conflicts
#494 opened
Apr 7, 2025 -
Make {stream,future}.new return both a readable and writable end
#497 opened
Apr 10, 2025
5 Issues closed by 2 people
-
Gate MVP example conflicts with BNF
#480 closed
Apr 8, 2025 -
Rust guest async bindings: low-overhead streams with no copies difficult to make memory safe
#471 closed
Apr 3, 2025 -
Should `{future,stream}.close-{readable,writable}` take ownership of the error-context?
#469 closed
Apr 3, 2025 -
Require-error-on-close may be a composability hazard
#472 closed
Apr 3, 2025 -
Defer `error-context` to after 0.3.0
#474 closed
Apr 3, 2025
3 Issues opened by 1 person
-
Refactor binary encoding of canon builtins for easier future extensibilty
#496 opened
Apr 8, 2025 -
Subtask cancellation
#495 opened
Apr 8, 2025 -
Refactoring event codes with respect to recent changes
#492 opened
Apr 3, 2025
12 Unresolved conversations
Sometimes conversations happen on old items that aren’t yet closed. Here is a list of all the Issues and Pull Requests with unresolved conversations.
-
How instantiate, argument and namespace interactive?
#483 commented on
Apr 3, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Allow non-canonical type alignment?
#258 commented on
Apr 3, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Resources with a function name that is the same as the resource name does not work in all languages
#478 commented on
Apr 7, 2025 • 0 new comments -
CABI: Add a `resource.consume` method for owned handles
#238 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Separately owned handles for read/write ends of futures/streams
#475 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Ambiguity between "operation cancelled" and "0-length operation completed"
#490 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
async: How does cross-task communication work?
#459 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Toolchain conventions and `context.get`
#485 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
async: Is it possible to have a background task?
#460 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Interaction with the memory64 proposal
#22 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Allow stream.{read,write}s of length 0 to query/signal readiness
#444 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Document some conventions for `context.{get,set}`
#491 commented on
Apr 8, 2025 • 0 new comments