Skip to content

Generic attributes parsing #1301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BenFordTytherington
Copy link
Collaborator

Generalise parsing of attributes, and make it more robust in terms of duplicate attributes, passthrough and reusability.
Fix #1132

@BenFordTytherington BenFordTytherington force-pushed the generic-attributes branch 2 times, most recently from 9abdf6a to 40325df Compare July 2, 2025 16:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (cd1d58b) to head (b5e2b50).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1301   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           75        76    +1     
  Lines        12772     12826   +54     
=========================================
+ Hits         12772     12826   +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

- Add get_one method to ignore duplicates and just get the first
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider a generic way to support pass through attributes in cxx-qt-gen
1 participant