Skip to content

ESM Migration #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tegefaulkes
Copy link
Contributor

@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes commented Mar 24, 2025

Description

This PR addresses ESM migration for js-encryptedfs

Issues Fixed

Tasks

  • 1. Migrate to ESM

Final checklist

  • Domain specific tests
  • Full tests
  • Updated inline-comment documentation
  • Lint fixed
  • Squash and rebased
  • Sanity check the final build

Copy link

linear bot commented Mar 24, 2025

ENG-558

@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes self-assigned this Mar 24, 2025
@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2025 02:50
@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes force-pushed the feature-eng-558-js-encryptedfs-migration-to-esm branch from 238f569 to 7bf7e71 Compare March 27, 2025 03:40
@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2025 03:40
@tegefaulkes tegefaulkes merged commit 5ffbb8c into staging Mar 27, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

js-encryptedfs: Migration to ESM
1 participant