[clang][docs] Fix example in likely/unlikely attr documentation

[marcauberer]

Fixes #126362

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Marc Auberer (marcauberer)

Changes

Fixes #126362

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126372.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td (+3-3)

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
index 0ad4c958d09830..2a0354a3222eba 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
@@ -2450,9 +2450,9 @@ path of execution, but that can be confusing:
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 
-  if (b) {
-    [[unlikely]] --b; // In the path of execution,
-                      // this branch is considered unlikely.
+  if (b) [[unlikely]] {
+    --b; // In the path of execution,
+         // this branch is considered unlikely.
   }
 
   if (b) {

[Sirraide]

Hmm, I think what this section is trying to demonstrate is that ‘According to the standard, this is in the path of execution and therefore supposed to be considered unlikely, but we don’t do that’, so maybe it’d be better to reword/expand the comment instead?