-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1787517: include stack dependencies in revision #32
Conversation
96d7d5c
to
79f8c46
Compare
'depends_on' => $stack_graph->getEdges(DifferentialRevisionDependsOnRevisionEdgeType::EDGECONST,), | ||
'dependents' => $stack_graph->getEdges(DifferentialRevisionDependedOnByRevisionEdgeType::EDGECONST), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we make this depended_on
to stay consistent with the Phab terminology?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WFM - I think predecessor
/successor
would be better, feel free to take or leave.
I do agree that they are the best terms out there but now that I think about it more, perhaps it should say But perhaps back on the Lando side we should use predecessors/successors. |
This change will help Lando calculate stack graph without making repeated requests to the `edge.search` endpoint. A similar approach is already used in Phabricator when loading the revision page.
f2c975b
to
d1f0800
Compare
This change will help Lando calculate stack graph without making
repeated requests to the
edge.search
endpoint. A similar approach isalready used in Phabricator when loading the revision page.