E0515 searching internet for the phrase "owned value" does not give helpful results

[KyleSiefring]

https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html#E0515

Consider returning an owned value instead:

Searching for this phrase does not define it within the first page of a google search.

[KyleSiefring]

Is the example (using iter vs into_iter) referring to some sort of design pattern?

[Centril]

Did you search for "owned value" or "rust owned value"?

[KyleSiefring]

rust owned value

[ExpHP]

For the record, when it says "owned value," it means something that does not borrow from anything else.

A precise technical term would be: "something with the 'static lifetime." This would certainly be more searchable, but I'm not certain that the search results that you get for it would be very helpful to the kind of user that is likely to run into this error!

Edit: In fact, the top Google search result is very misleading! https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/scope/lifetime/static_lifetime.html . It seems to suggest that only static items and promoted consts have the 'static lifetime, which is simply not true. (it's just that they're the only things that admit a &'static borrow)

[jonas-schievink]

FWIW the book goes into quite a lot of detail here: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-00-understanding-ownership.html

[gilescope]

+1, Link 'owned value' to the book?

[ChiefMilesEdgeworth]

Maybe use this link, and instead of saying "owned value", say "non-reference"?