css-contain-1/issues-2018-11-cr.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-11-08 CR</title>
<style>
  .a  { background: lightgreen }
  .d  { background: lightblue  }
  .r  { background: orange     }
  .fo { background: red        }
  .open   { border: solid red; padding: 0.2em; }
  :target { box-shadow: 0.25em 0.25em 0.25em;  }
</style>

<h1>CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-11-08 CR</h1>

<p>Review document: <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20181108/">https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20181108/</a>

<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/</a>

<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>

<ul>
 <li class="a">Accepted or Rejected and positive response
 <li class="r">Rejected and no response
 <li class="fo">Rejected and negative response
 <li class="d">Deferred
 <li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
</ul>

<p class=open>Open issues are marked like this</p>

<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
        <pre class='a' id='issue-1'>
Issue 1. <a href='#issue-1'>#</a>
Summary:  Style containment is difficult to implement, and should not hold up the rest
From:     Emilio
Comment:  <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280</a>
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280#issuecomment-467588765'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280#issuecomment-467588765</a></pre>
<pre class='oi' id='issue-2'>
Issue 2. <a href='#issue-2'>#</a>
Summary:  Spec makes incorrect claims about outside-in isolation
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3357'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3357</a>
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editors' discretion</pre>
<script>
(function () {
    var sheet = document.styleSheets[0];
    function addCheckbox(className) {
        var element = document.querySelector('*.' + className);
        var label = document.createElement('label');
        label.innerHTML = element.innerHTML;
        element.innerHTML = null;
        var check = document.createElement('input');
        check.type = 'checkbox';
        if (className == 'open') {
            check.checked = false;
            sheet.insertRule('pre:not(.open)' + '{}', sheet.cssRules.length);
            check.onchange = function (e) {
                rule.style.display = this.checked ? 'none' : 'block';
            }
        }
        else {
            check.checked = true;
            sheet.insertRule('pre.' + className + '{}', sheet.cssRules.length);
            check.onchange = function (e) {
                rule.style.display = this.checked ? 'block' : 'none';
            }
        }
        var rule = sheet.cssRules[sheet.cssRules.length - 1];
        element.appendChild(label);
        label.insertBefore(check, label.firstChild);
    }
    ['a', 'd', 'fo', 'oi', 'r', 'open'].forEach(addCheckbox);
}());
</script>