issues-fpwd-2015.txt

Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-ui-4-20150922/
Title:    CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 4

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  'appearance' is not web compatible
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250#issuecomment-301033093
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250#issuecomment-306788821
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250#issuecomment-320003220
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Dec/0003.html
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d7a03ec25668fea9a933e6eaf2f1d382f4bdf52e
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250#issuecomment-492759907
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3543
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3544
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3545
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3546
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1250#issuecomment-556123244
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Spatial Navigation needs a new home in WICG
From:     Tantek Çelik
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1948
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1948#issuecomment-343587403
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Please add "tab-index" to CSS specification
From:     Nadya678
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1748
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1748#issuecomment-344493880
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Arrow-index property
From:     Brad Kemper
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1762
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1762#issuecomment-344504643
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Add a property controlling the navigation order
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1764
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1764#issuecomment-344493895
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Scoping navigation/focus subtrees
From:     James Craig
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1949
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1949#issuecomment-344495152
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  none value for nav-up, nav-right, nav-down, nav-left properties
From:     Jihye Hong
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1822
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1822#issuecomment-330418767
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1822#issuecomment-330713355
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Activating spatial navigation
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1940
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1940#issuecomment-344522185
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-11-07/#e907696
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1940#issuecomment-344522185
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Spec is hard to understand with regards to bidi and ellipsis
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2125
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2125#issuecomment-356971335
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Rendering of <input> is weird and undefined
From:     isangelawu
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1941
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1941#issuecomment-345380779
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1941#issuecomment-356685574
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Grammar of outline-style poorly defined
From:     Louis Lazaris
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2466
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2466#issuecomment-376016337
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  let user-select:contain prohibit selection from outside
From:     Yoichi Osato
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1815
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1815#issuecomment-329681869
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1815#issuecomment-376457305
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1815#issuecomment-418918926/1814
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1815#issuecomment-418936418
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Clarify effect of anonymous block container boxes on text-overflow
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2595
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2595#issuecomment-386153703
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2595#issuecomment-386153703
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Require link-pointer when pointer is over a link
From:     Tobi Reif
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2664
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2664#issuecomment-388486742
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2664#issuecomment-395243086
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Make the text cursor better match writing modes
From:     張俊芝 (Zhang-Junzhi)
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3196
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3196#issuecomment-427467122
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3196#issuecomment-427736600
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3196#issuecomment-430693269
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Hovering over se-resize value definition in the spec doesn't change the cursor
From:     Myles MaxField
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3219
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3196#issuecomment-427736600
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  The computed value rules of user-select is problematic
From:     Yoichi Osato & Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/336
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/336#issuecomment-248437942
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3344
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3344#issuecomment-466839533
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3344#issuecomment-467637093
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Add a "caret" caret-shape
From:     Christoph Päper
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4402
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4402#issuecomment-569506963
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Change the pointer cursor to indicate any interactive element
From:     Roman Komarov
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1936
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1936#issuecomment-420722704
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  The appearance property needs to be made web-compatible
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3024
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3024#issuecomment-467639795
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  selector for overwrite mode to specify "caret-shape:block"
From:     Yosinch
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/133
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/133#issuecomment-221749233
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/133#issuecomment-221749233
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/133#issuecomment-223470682
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  define user-select:all and contenteditable interaction
From:     Yoichi Osato
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/231
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/231#issuecomment-228666013
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/231#issuecomment-229570367
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Clicking in a user-select:none element should not change the selection
From:     Cyril Auburtin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/319
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/319#issuecomment-246901524
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0079.html
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Inline issue about compat values for appearance property not needed
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/802
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/802#issuecomment-266931000<Paste>
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Fix broken links
From:     Fuqiao Xue
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1168
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Add CanIUse panels
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1200
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 27.
Summary:  Make selection change behavior configurable
From:     Kagami Sascha Rosylight
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1317
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1317#issuecomment-306400825
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1317#issuecomment-310130977
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1317#issuecomment-310577046
----
Issue 28.
Summary:  Move box-sizing property to the right specification
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1906
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1906#issuecomment-339795444
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2458
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2458#issuecomment-374848414
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2739
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1906#issuecomment-342250173
----
Issue 29.
Summary:  Fix typo
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2142
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2144
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 30.
Summary:  Typo in image cursors
From:     Terence Eden
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2176
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2176#issuecomment-356453793
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 31.
Summary:  Want way to match look and feel of native UI components
From:     Sabith Pocker
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2302
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2302#issuecomment-365001793
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2302#issuecomment-365191763
----
Issue 32.
Summary:  Needs way to show high res cursors on high res screens
From:     Photopea
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2480#issuecomment-376818293
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2480#issuecomment-569513147
----
Issue 33.
Summary:  Incorrect definition in grammar of outline-width
From:     Eric Willigers
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2535
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2538
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 34.
Summary:  Cursor should use <image>, not <url>
From:     Chris Lilley
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3432
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3432#issuecomment-525653527
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3432#issuecomment-569512898
----
Issue 35.
Summary:  Remove 'button-bevel' form appearance
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3529
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3529#issuecomment-493484265
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3942
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3942#pullrequestreview-243295690
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3942#issuecomment-497226728
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 36.
Summary:  Add an issue about some values of appearance
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3967
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 37.
Summary:  Broken Link
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3825
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 38.
Summary:  Use the term "widget" from HTML rather than the ambiguous "control" or "form control"
From:     Simon Pieters & Mike Pennisi
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3970
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3990
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 39.
Summary:  Fix typo / grammar
From:     Brian Kardell
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3976
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4243
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 40.
Summary:  Fix typo
From:     Bang Seongbeom
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4114
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 41.
Summary:  Move text-overflow to the css-overflow specification
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2745
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0041.html
----
Issue 42.
Summary:  Add a new property `major-overflow-direction`
From:     Zhang Junzhi
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2602
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2602#issuecomment-536425120
----
Issue 43.
Summary:  Make appearance: menulist-button match WebKit/Chromium
From:     Simon Pieters
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3551
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3574
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 44.
Summary:  Add way to request dark-mode form controls
From:     Simon Fraser
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3299
Closed:   Retracted
----
Issue 45.
Summary:  user-select should not be non-animatable
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3153
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3153#issuecomment-577666434