Skip to content

[IgaApplication] [FluidDynamicsApplication] sbm fluid condition for the Stokes problem #13538

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NickNick9
Copy link
Contributor

📝 Description

Boundary conditions of Dirichlet type with the Shifted Boundary Method for the stationary Stokes problem

Corresponding test has been added.

@NickNick9 NickNick9 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2025 12:35
Comment on lines 56 to 57
const GeometryType::IntegrationPointsArrayType& integration_points = r_geometry.IntegrationPoints();
const GeometryType::ShapeFunctionsGradientsType& DN_De = r_geometry.ShapeFunctionsLocalGradients(r_geometry.GetDefaultIntegrationMethod());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r_integration_points

Comment on lines 417 to 418
double SbmFluidConditionDirichlet::computeTaylorTerm(double derivative, double dx, IndexType n_k, double dy, IndexType k)
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ComputeTaylorTerm

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should you have also the InitializeMaterialResponse here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so, @rubenzorrilla correct?

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewgorgi andrewgorgi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants