-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
🧹 chore: Improve CSRF tests coverage #3531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughTwo new test functions were added to the CSRF middleware test suite. One checks for a warning log when using an insecure cookie configuration, and the other verifies correct deletion of CSRF tokens from both session and generic storage backends. No existing code or tests were modified. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Function
participant Config as CSRF Config
participant Logger as Logger
Test->>Config: Create config with CookieSameSite=None
Config->>Logger: Emit warning if extractor is cookie and SameSite=None
Logger-->>Test: Log output captured and checked
sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Function
participant Storage as Session/Generic Storage
Test->>Storage: Set dummy CSRF token
Test->>Storage: Call deleteTokenFromStorage
Storage-->>Test: Token is deleted (not retrievable)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds regression tests to ensure that the CSRF middleware correctly warns when an unsupported cookie SameSite value is used and that token deletion works across both session and storage branches.
- Added a test (Test_configDefault_WarnCookieSameSite) to verify that a warning is logged when using CookieSameSite "None".
- Added a test (Test_deleteTokenFromStorage) that confirms token deletion functionality for both session and storage implementations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the test coverage for the CSRF middleware. It introduces new regression tests that validate critical aspects of CSRF token management, specifically ensuring that appropriate warnings are issued for potentially insecure cookie configurations and confirming the robust functionality of token deletion across various storage types.
Highlights
- CSRF Cookie SameSite Warning Test: I've added a new test case (
Test_configDefault_WarnCookieSameSite
) to ensure that a warning is logged when the CSRF cookie'sSameSite
attribute is set to 'None' while theKeyLookup
is configured to use a cookie. This configuration is generally not recommended for security, and the test verifies that the system correctly alerts developers to this potential issue. - CSRF Token Deletion Test: I've implemented a new test (
Test_deleteTokenFromStorage
) to verify the correct behavior of thedeleteTokenFromStorage
function. This test ensures that the function properly handles CSRF token deletion from both session-based and general storage mechanisms, covering different scenarios for token invalidation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request adds two valuable regression tests for the CSRF middleware. Test_configDefault_WarnCookieSameSite
correctly verifies the logging of warnings for specific cookie configurations. Test_deleteTokenFromStorage
thoroughly checks token deletion logic for both session-based and direct storage mechanisms. The tests are well-written, clear, and effectively cover the intended scenarios. No issues of medium or higher severity were found.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3531 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.40% 90.47% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 110 110
Lines 10939 10939
==========================================
+ Hits 9889 9897 +8
+ Misses 791 781 -10
- Partials 259 261 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50
.
Benchmark suite | Current: c385b2e | Previous: 3b2af61 | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Ctx_SendString_B |
16.87 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
9.364 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1.80 |
Benchmark_Ctx_SendString_B - ns/op |
16.87 ns/op |
9.364 ns/op |
1.80 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Summary