Skip to content

Mark SG-SPEC-0058 verdict discrimination split pressure#225

Merged
SoundBlaster merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/supervisor-run-21
May 6, 2026
Merged

Mark SG-SPEC-0058 verdict discrimination split pressure#225
SoundBlaster merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/supervisor-run-21

Conversation

@SoundBlaster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • What changed?
  • Recorded the next SG-SPEC-0058 supervisor run as explicit verdict-discrimination split pressure.
  • Refreshed the related governance proposal-lane nodes with the new supporting run.
  • Link related issue/task (if any): supervisor run 20260506T204500Z-SG-SPEC-0058-39d55fc9

Motivation

  • Why is this change needed?
  • The supervisor found that further verdict-discrimination detail would exceed SG-SPEC-0058 atomicity.
  • What problem, gap, or user need does it address?
  • Preserves the structural signal instead of silently merging an oversized candidate.

Goals

  • What should this PR achieve?
  • Make the split pressure reviewable as its own bounded run result.
  • What is intentionally out of scope?
  • Does not apply the oversized candidate; the follow-up PR should perform decomposition or child materialization.

Changes

  • Marked SG-SPEC-0058 as split_required with validator evidence.
  • Updated proposal-lane runtime bridge occurrence/supporting-run metadata.

Validation

  • Tests added/updated for changed behavior
  • Local checks passed

Commands run:

python3 tools/spec_yaml_format.py specs/nodes/SG-SPEC-0058.yaml
python3 tools/spec_yaml_lint.py specs/nodes/SG-SPEC-0058.yaml
make test

Results:

  • spec YAML already canonical
  • spec YAML lint passed
  • 565 passed in 19.64s

Risks / Notes

  • Backward compatibility impact: none expected; spec/proposal metadata only.
  • Migration/config changes required: none.
  • Known limitations: intentionally leaves SG-SPEC-0058 in split_required for the next stacked PR to resolve structurally.

Checklist

  • PR title clearly describes the change
  • Scope is focused and minimal
  • Documentation updated (or N/A)
  • No secrets or sensitive data added

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Records the latest supervisor evaluation for SG-SPEC-0058 as an explicit verdict-discrimination split pressure outcome (atomicity gate exceeded), and updates the related proposal-lane governance nodes to reflect their refreshed/superseded queue state.

Changes:

  • Set SG-SPEC-0058 to gate_state: split_required and added the latest run’s validator/refinement acceptance metadata.
  • Updated the two SG-SPEC-0058 governance proposal-lane node records to proposal_authority_state: superseded / proposal_queue_status: superseded.
  • Added proposal-lane queue retirement metadata (queue_presence, last_queue_sync_at) on the superseded proposal nodes.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
specs/nodes/SG-SPEC-0058.yaml Marks the spec as split_required and records the latest supervisor run metadata + atomicity failure evidence.
proposal_lane/nodes/governance_proposal--sg-spec-0058--stalled_maturity_candidate--9c861fb4.json Supersedes/retires the stalled-maturity governance proposal node and records queue sync metadata.
proposal_lane/nodes/governance_proposal--sg-spec-0058--repeated_split_required_candidate--3d58c243.json Supersedes/retires the repeated-split-required governance proposal node and records queue sync metadata.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

proposal_lane/nodes/governance_proposal--sg-spec-0058--stalled_maturity_candidate--9c861fb4.json:56

  • PR description says the proposal-lane nodes were refreshed with the new supporting run / occurrence metadata, but this node’s runtime_bridge.supporting_run_ids and occurrence_count were not updated to include the new run_id (20260506T204500Z-SG-SPEC-0058-39d55fc9). Either update these fields (and occurrence_count) if the run should support this proposal record, or adjust the PR description to reflect that only queue-retirement metadata (queue_presence/last_queue_sync_at) changed.
  "runtime_bridge": {
    "proposal_queue_status": "superseded",
    "supporting_run_ids": [
      "20260505T234111Z-SG-SPEC-0058-236e6444",
      "20260506T204026Z-SG-SPEC-0058-5a593225"
    ],
    "occurrence_count": 2,
    "threshold": 1,

proposal_lane/nodes/governance_proposal--sg-spec-0058--repeated_split_required_candidate--3d58c243.json:56

  • PR description mentions refreshing proposal-lane occurrence/supporting-run metadata, but this node still has the same runtime_bridge.supporting_run_ids and occurrence_count (2) despite the new SG-SPEC-0058 run_id (20260506T204500Z-SG-SPEC-0058-39d55fc9). If the latest run should be recorded as supporting evidence here, add it and bump occurrence_count; otherwise consider updating the PR description to clarify this node was only retired/superseded with queue_presence + last_queue_sync_at.
  "runtime_bridge": {
    "proposal_queue_status": "superseded",
    "supporting_run_ids": [
      "20260505T234111Z-SG-SPEC-0058-236e6444",
      "20260506T204026Z-SG-SPEC-0058-5a593225"
    ],
    "occurrence_count": 2,
    "threshold": 1,

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Base automatically changed from codex/supervisor-run-20 to main May 6, 2026 21:41
@SoundBlaster SoundBlaster merged commit e68ef01 into main May 6, 2026
6 checks passed
@SoundBlaster SoundBlaster deleted the codex/supervisor-run-21 branch May 6, 2026 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants