From 1b2a1e63898baf80e8e830991284e1534bc54766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pingfan Liu Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:23:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] drivers/base: reorder consumer and its children behind suppliers commit 52cdbdd49853 ("driver core: correct device's shutdown order") introduces supplier<-consumer order in devices_kset. The commit tries to cleverly maintain both parent<-child and supplier<-consumer order by reordering a device when probing. This method makes things simple and clean, but unfortunately, breaks parent<-child order in some case, which is described in next patch in this series. Here this patch tries to resolve supplier<-consumer by only reordering a device when it has suppliers, and takes care of the following scenario: [consumer, children] [ ... potential ... ] supplier ^ ^ After moving the consumer and its children after the supplier, the potentail section may contain consumers whose supplier is inside children, and this poses the requirement to dry out all consumpers in the section recursively. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Dave Young Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu --- drivers/base/base.h | 1 + drivers/base/core.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h index a75c3025fb7886..37f86ca20787da 100644 --- a/drivers/base/base.h +++ b/drivers/base/base.h @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ extern void device_unblock_probing(void); /* /sys/devices directory */ extern struct kset *devices_kset; +extern int device_reorder_consumer(struct device *dev); extern void devices_kset_move_last(struct device *dev); #if defined(CONFIG_MODULES) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c index 8113d2cb02274a..db30e86a41de5c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/core.c +++ b/drivers/base/core.c @@ -161,6 +161,103 @@ static bool is_consumer(struct device *query, struct device *supplier) return false; } +/* recursively move the potential consumers in open section (left, right) + * after the barrier + */ +static int __device_reorder_consumer(struct device *consumer, + struct list_head *left, struct list_head *right, + struct pos_info *p) +{ + struct list_head *iter; + struct device *c_dev, *s_dev, *tail_dev; + + descendants_reorder_after_pos(consumer, p); + tail_dev = p->tail; + /* (left, right) may contain consumers, hence checking if any moved + * child serving as supplier. The reversing order help us to meet + * the last supplier of a consumer. + */ + list_opensect_for_each_reverse(iter, left, right) { + struct list_head *l_iter, *moved_left, *moved_right; + + moved_left = (&consumer->kobj.entry)->prev; + moved_right = tail_dev->kobj.entry.next; + /* the moved section may contain potential suppliers */ + list_opensect_for_each_reverse(l_iter, moved_left, + moved_right) { + s_dev = list_entry(l_iter, struct device, kobj.entry); + c_dev = list_entry(iter, struct device, kobj.entry); + /* to fix: this poses extra effort for locking */ + if (is_consumer(c_dev, s_dev)) { + p->tail = NULL; + /* to fix: lock issue */ + p->pos = s_dev; + /* reorder after the last supplier */ + __device_reorder_consumer(c_dev, + l_iter, right, p); + } + } + } + return 0; +} + +static int find_last_supplier(struct device *dev, struct device *supplier) +{ + struct device_link *link; + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) { + if (link->supplier == supplier) + return 1; + } + if (dev == supplier) + return -1; + return 0; +} + +/* When reodering, take care of the range of (old_pos(dev), new_pos(dev)), + * there may be requirement to recursively move item. + */ +int device_reorder_consumer(struct device *dev) +{ + struct list_head *iter, *left, *right; + struct device *cur_dev; + struct pos_info info; + int ret, idx; + + idx = device_links_read_lock(); + if (list_empty(&dev->links.suppliers)) { + device_links_read_unlock(idx); + return 0; + } + spin_lock(&devices_kset->list_lock); + list_for_each_prev(iter, &devices_kset->list) { + cur_dev = list_entry(iter, struct device, kobj.entry); + ret = find_last_supplier(dev, cur_dev); + switch (ret) { + case -1: + goto unlock; + case 1: + break; + case 0: + continue; + } + } + BUG_ON(!ret); + + /* record the affected open section */ + left = dev->kobj.entry.prev; + right = iter; + info.pos = list_entry(iter, struct device, kobj.entry); + info.tail = NULL; + /* dry out the consumers in (left,right) */ + __device_reorder_consumer(dev, left, right, &info); + +unlock: + spin_unlock(&devices_kset->list_lock); + device_links_read_unlock(idx); + return 0; +} + static int device_reorder_to_tail(struct device *dev, void *not_used) { struct device_link *link;