Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default settings for new pocket queries #199

Closed
CachingFoX opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Default settings for new pocket queries #199

CachingFoX opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
improvement status: completed enhancement, improvement implemented
Milestone

Comments

@CachingFoX
Copy link
Collaborator

CachingFoX commented Mar 8, 2017

There are some settings for a new pocket query which have be made every time.

  • set number of caches in pq
  • set options I haven't found, I don't own, Are not on my ignore list, Is Enabled
  • Option: Include PQ name in download file name
  • set difficulity and terrain score
  • generate pq today
@CachingFoX CachingFoX changed the title Predefined settings for new pocket queries Default settings for new pocket queries Mar 10, 2017
@CachingFoX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

grafik

CachingFoX added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2017
@CachingFoX CachingFoX self-assigned this Mar 10, 2017
@CachingFoX CachingFoX modified the milestones: v0.5, v0.6 Mar 10, 2017
CachingFoX added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2017
CachingFoX added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2017
…reInConflict and function verifyPqOptions to findPqOptionsAreInConflict; added comment
CachingFoX added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2017
2Abendsegler added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2017
Merge changes for #199, #200 and #222 (requested for v0.6)
@2Abendsegler 2Abendsegler added status: completed enhancement, improvement implemented and removed status: wait for merge labels Mar 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement status: completed enhancement, improvement implemented
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants