Fix duplicate detection logic in slapi_str2charray_ext by ensuring exact match on string length#6333
Merged
progier389 merged 1 commit into389ds:mainfrom Sep 23, 2024
Conversation
Updated the condition for checking duplicates to ensure that the lengths of the candidate and original strings are equal. This prevents false positives by confirming that the strings are identical at the start and match in length, enforcing an exact duplicate check.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated the condition for checking duplicates to ensure that the lengths of the candidate and original strings are equal. This prevents false positives by confirming that the strings are identical at the start and match in length, enforcing an exact duplicate check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Reporter: Pavel Nekrasov (p.nekrasov@fobos-nt.ru).
issue: #6338
Reviewed by: @progier