Skip to content

/mbed-os

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

QSPIF general_block_device test is failing on EFM32GG11_STK3701 #11633

Closed
maciejbocianski opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
Jira status: OPEN mirrored type: bug

Comments

@maciejbocianski
Copy link
Member

@maciejbocianski maciejbocianski commented Oct 4, 2019

Description

QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes test is failing on EFM32GG11_STK3701

GCC_ARM + master

[1570191655.44][CONN][RXD] >>> Running case #6: 'QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes'...
[1570191655.44][CONN][RXD]
[1570191655.44][CONN][RXD] Test program-read small data sizes, from 1 to 7 bytes..
[1570191655.44][CONN][INF] found KV pair in stream: {{__testcase_start;QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes}}, queued...
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.52][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.52][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.52][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.52][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.58][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.58][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.60][CONN][RXD] :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.60][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.60][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.60][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.67][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.67][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.69][CONN][RXD] :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.69][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.69][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.69][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.83][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.83][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.83][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.83][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.89][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.89][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.91][CONN][RXD] :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.91][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.91][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.91][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.97][CONN][RXD] :614::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.97][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.99][CONN][RXD] :620::FAIL: Expected 0 Was -4001
[1570191655.99][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
mbedgt: :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191655.99][CONN][RXD] :623::FAIL: Expected 0 Was 19
[1570191656.01][CONN][RXD] >>> failure with reason 'No Failure' during 'Unknown Location'
[1570191656.01][CONN][INF] found KV pair in stream: {{__testcase_finish;QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes;0;16}}, queued...
[1570191656.02][CONN][RXD] >>> 'QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes': 0 passed, 16 failed with reason 'Test Cases Failed'

...

| target                    | platform_name     | test suite                                              | result | elapsed_time (sec) | copy_method |
|---------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|-------------|
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | FAIL   | 28.95              | default     |
| target                    | platform_name     | test suite                                              | test case                                      | passed | failed | result | elapsed_time (sec) |
|---------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------|
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | DEFAULT Testing get type functionality         | 1      | 0      | OK     | 0.0                |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing BlockDevice erase functionality  | 1      | 0      | OK     | 0.18               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing Deinit block device              | 1      | 0      | OK     | 0.02               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing Init block device                | 1      | 0      | OK     | 0.04               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing contiguous erase, write and read | 1      | 0      | OK     | 4.32               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing multi threads erase program read | 1      | 0      | OK     | 5.87               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing program read small data sizes    | 0      | 16     | FAIL   | 0.57               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing read write random blocks         | 1      | 0      | OK     | 1.21               |
| EFM32GG11_STK3701-GCC_ARM | EFM32GG11_STK3701 | features-storage-tests-blockdevice-general_block_device | QSPIF Testing unaligned erase blocks           | 1      | 0      | OK     | 0.06               |

@jamesbeyond

Issue request type

[ ] Question
[ ] Enhancement
[X] Bug
@jamesbeyond

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesbeyond jamesbeyond commented Oct 4, 2019

@ARMmbed/team-silabs
@stevew817

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

@stevew817 stevew817 commented Oct 4, 2019

Well, that's a useful error description...
@maciejbocianski maciejbocianski mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2019
Merged
@maciejbocianski

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

@maciejbocianski maciejbocianski commented Oct 4, 2019

fix: #11636
@jamesbeyond

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesbeyond jamesbeyond commented Oct 4, 2019

Seems we don't need to worries about description anymore @stevew817
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the type: bug label Oct 4, 2019
@ciarmcom

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

@ciarmcom ciarmcom commented Oct 4, 2019

Internal Jira reference: https://jira.arm.com/browse/MBOCUSTRIA-1870
@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

@0xc0170 0xc0170 commented Nov 6, 2019

fix: #11636

Fixed
@0xc0170 0xc0170 closed this Nov 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Jira status: OPEN mirrored type: bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
5 participants
@maciejbocianski @jamesbeyond @stevew817 @ciarmcom @0xc0170
You can’t perform that action at this time.