Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Realtek Ameba does not implement FlashIAP #4461

Closed
JanneKiiskila opened this issue Jun 6, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Realtek Ameba does not implement FlashIAP #4461

JanneKiiskila opened this issue Jun 6, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Type: Bug
  • Related issue: #abc
  • Priority: Blocker

Bug

Target
RealTek Ameba -
mbed compile -m REALTEK_RTL8195AM

Toolchain:
N/A

Toolchain version:
N/A

mbed-cli version:
(mbed --version)
1.1

meed-os sha:
(git log -n1 --oneline)
mbed-os-5.5-rc1
commit 92fbf2a (HEAD -> mbed-os-5.5, tag: mbed-os-5.5.0-rc1, origin/mbed-os-5.5)

DAPLink version:
N/A

Expected behavior

FlashIAP is implemented.

Actual behavior

FlashIAP is not implemented, therefore cloud client can't compile on Realtek Ameba.

Steps to reproduce

Try to compile the mbed-cloud-client-example using mbed OS 5.5. RC1 and current tip of mbed-client-pal.

Or create minimal program that tries to use FlashIAP flash;

@JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MarceloSalazar @avolinski @marcuschangarm @0xc0170 - please note.

@theotherjimmy theotherjimmy changed the title Realtek Ameba not implementing FlashIAP Realtek Ameba does not implement FlashIAP Jun 6, 2017
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jun 6, 2017

cc @Archcady - I could not locate the flash IAP on the branch, was it implemented?

@screamerbg
Copy link
Contributor

@JanneKiiskila is this still relevant? Seems FLASH HAL is implemented https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/blob/master/targets/TARGET_Realtek/TARGET_AMEBA/flash_api.c. Please close if completed.

@JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Contributor Author

JanneKiiskila commented Jul 17, 2017

Yes, this can be closed. We haven't tested it though, because the linker issue is still unresolved (#4462).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants