Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new delivery for FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA #9666

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 25, 2019

Conversation

Projects
None yet
9 participants
@orenc17
Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 11, 2019

Description

Adapt FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA & FUTURE_SEQUANA_M0_PSA to new artifact delivery system

Waits for #9708

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[X] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-psa @ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools @lrusinowicz

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers Feb 11, 2019

@ciarmcom

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 11, 2019

@orenc17, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@cmonr cmonr requested review from ARMmbed/mbed-os-psa Feb 12, 2019

@@ -7992,6 +7992,7 @@
"MBEDTLS_ENTROPY_NV_SEED"
],
"deliver_to_target": "FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA",
"delivery_dir": "TARGET_Cypress/TARGET_PSOC6_FUTURE/TARGET_FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA/prebuilt",

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@cmonr

cmonr Feb 12, 2019

Contributor

🎉

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 12, 2019

@0xc0170 Do these binaries need the usual readme and license additions next to them?
(If so, where is that nibble documented?)

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 12, 2019

@0xc0170 Do these binaries need the usual readme and license additions next to them?
(If so, where is that nibble documented?)

Yes they need, let me check the docs and fix it if not in there.

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 12, 2019

Section How to apply PBL correctly in licensing covers this

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 12, 2019

@lrusinowicz Please review

@0xc0170 0xc0170 added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Feb 12, 2019

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 12, 2019

Ci started

Show resolved Hide resolved targets/targets.json Outdated
@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 12, 2019

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 3 of 8 test jobs failed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-IAR
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM

@orenc17 orenc17 force-pushed the kfnta:sequana_psa_delivery branch Feb 12, 2019

@orenc17

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Feb 12, 2019

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers
Fixed according to @bridadan comments
please run CI and merge as soon as you can

@alekla01

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 12, 2019

Restarted CI after #9677

@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 12, 2019

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 3 of 8 test jobs failed
Build number : 2
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-IAR

@cmonr cmonr added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Feb 12, 2019

@orenc17

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Feb 12, 2019

please run CI again. i didnt see any error in the logs
also the logs seems to run a version before the last commit

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 12, 2019

sigh, yup that in fact did happen. Good catch.

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 12, 2019

CI started

@orenc17 orenc17 force-pushed the kfnta:sequana_psa_delivery branch Feb 14, 2019

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 14, 2019

Ci restarted

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 14, 2019

New pushed after CI being started? Please let us know as we should cancel the current one if not yet done.

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 14, 2019

Is this now CI ready or not?

@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 14, 2019

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 3 of 12 test jobs failed
Build number : 4
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_exporter
@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 14, 2019

CI started

@orenc17 orenc17 force-pushed the kfnta:sequana_psa_delivery branch 2 times, most recently Feb 14, 2019

@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 14, 2019

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 1 of 12 test jobs failed
Build number : 5
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test

@cmonr cmonr added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Feb 15, 2019

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 15, 2019

New pushed after CI being started? Please let us know as we should cancel the current one if not yet done.

Holding CI restarts until the PR is ready...

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 19, 2019

Still waiting for #9708

orenc17 added some commits Feb 14, 2019

@orenc17 orenc17 force-pushed the kfnta:sequana_psa_delivery branch to 49aae7b Feb 22, 2019

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 22, 2019

@orenc17 #9708 is now merged!

Is a rebase needed, or should this now be good to enter CI?

@orenc17

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Feb 22, 2019

Rebased and ready for CI

@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 24, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 12 of 12 test jobs passed
Build number : 6
Build artifacts

@orenc17 orenc17 referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2019

Merged

mbed-SPM updates #9823

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 0d3fba8 into ARMmbed:master Feb 25, 2019

27 checks passed

continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-head This commit looks good
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
jenkins-ci/build-ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-ARMC6 Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-GCC_ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-IAR Success
Details
jenkins-ci/cloud-client-test Success
Details
jenkins-ci/dynamic-memory-usage RTOS ROM(+0 bytes) RAM(+0 bytes)
Details
jenkins-ci/exporter Success
Details
jenkins-ci/greentea-test Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-GCC_ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-IAR Success
Details
jenkins-ci/unittests Success
Details
travis-ci/astyle Local astyle testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/docs Local docs testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/doxy-spellcheck Local doxy-spellcheck testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/events Passed, runtime is 9221 cycles (-945 cycles)
Details
travis-ci/gitattributestest Local gitattributestest testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/include_check Local include_check testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/licence_check Local licence_check testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/littlefs Passed, code size is 8408B (+0.00%)
Details
travis-ci/psa-autogen Local psa-autogen testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py2.7 Local tools-py2.7 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.5 Local tools-py3.5 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.6 Local tools-py3.6 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.7 Local tools-py3.7 testing has passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.