With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "DON'T KNOW", "NO" or "YES".
text_A: The state of Pennsylvania is composed of 60 judicial districts, 59 of which have their own magisterial district judges who handle preliminary hearings in both felony and misdemeanor trials, along with all minor criminal charges that can be decided summarily, and small civil claims; these judges previously being known as district judges or justices of the peace, and Philadelphia is the only district that does not follow this model. Most criminal and civil cases originate in the Courts of Common Pleas, which also serve as appellate courts to the district judges and for local agency decisions. The Superior Court hears all appeals from the Courts of Common Pleas not expressly designated to the Commonwealth Court or Supreme Court. It also has original jurisdiction to review warrants for wiretap surveillance. The Commonwealth Court is limited to appeals from final orders of certain state agencies and certain designated cases from the Courts of Common Pleas. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the final appellate court. All judges in Pennsylvania are elected; the chief justice is determined by seniority.
text_B: From this brief passage, does it sound possible (unlikely perhaps, but possible) that a resident of downtown Philadelphia could make a case that his right to a jury of his peers was not being faithfully upheld, since the court system would essentially require his felony case to be decided in a different district?
YES.