With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "DON'T KNOW", "NO" or "YES".
text_A: For Ingres, colour played an entirely secondary role in art. He wrote, "Colour adds nothing to a painting; but it is the handmaiden, because all it does is to render more agreeable the true perfections of the art. Rubens and Van Dyck can be pleasing at first sight, but they are deceptive; they are from the poor school of colourists, the school of deception. Never use bright colours, they are anti-historic. It is better to fall into gray than to into bright colours." The Institute in Paris complained in 1838 that the students of Ingres in Rome "had a deplorable lack of knowledge of the truth and power of colour, and a knowledge of the different effects of light. A dull and opaque effect is found in all their canvases. They seem to have only been lit by twilight." The poet and critic Baudelaire observed: "the students of M. Ingres have very uselessly avoided any semblance of colour; they believe or pretend to believe that they are not needed in painting."
text_B: Is it likely that Ingres would have preferred a highly technical black and white sketch over a bright and colorful painting?
YES.