A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. Epidemiologists have run studies to try to find any relationship between the development of tumors in the brain and use of cell phone during participants' lives, and these studies have not drawn firm conclusions, and have only been able to say that is any such effect exists, it can't be significantly large. B:Does the passage still leave open the possibility that cell phones could be dangerous, but that the effect has been hidden by medical advances that have reduced brain-cancer from other causes? Answer: texas
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. By contrast, epidemiological studies looking for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, have shown that people who use cell phones more often actually exhibited less brain cancer than those who didn't own a phone, but were otherwise essentially identical in other regards, which thus demonstrates that any effect, even if it exists, cannot be large. B:Would you say, reasonably, that the WHO's cautious stance is at least somewhat warranted, since it has not been contradicted by any scientific data? Answer: principle
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. It would be impossible to run epidemiological studies to look for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, because the wide array of confounding variables would make any possible outcome so unreliable as to be practically inconclusive, so epidemiologists can only point to declining brain-cancer rates in general in rich countries that had widespread cellphone use, along with laboratory studies on mice which have never shown tumor growth as a result of cell phone emissions, and say that the effect, if it exists, cannot be a large one. B:Although it would be highly misguided to assume causation from correlation, could someone reading this passage get the idea that cell phones might actually slow down the growth of cancer cells in the human brain that would otherwise have come about from some other cause? Answer: texas
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. By contrast, epidemiological studies looking for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, have shown that people who use cell phones more often actually exhibited less brain cancer than those who didn't own a phone, but were otherwise essentially identical in other regards, which thus demonstrates that any effect, even if it exists, cannot be large. B:Although it would be highly misguided to assume causation from correlation, could someone reading this passage get the idea that cell phones might actually slow down the growth of cancer cells in the human brain that would otherwise have come about from some other cause? Answer: texas
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. It would be impossible to run epidemiological studies to look for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, because the wide array of confounding variables would make any possible outcome so unreliable as to be practically inconclusive, so epidemiologists can only point to declining brain-cancer rates in general in rich countries that had widespread cellphone use, along with laboratory studies on mice which have never shown tumor growth as a result of cell phone emissions, and say that the effect, if it exists, cannot be a large one. B:Does the passage still leave open the possibility that cell phones could be dangerous, but that the effect has been hidden by medical advances that have reduced brain-cancer from other causes? Answer: texas
A:A free-trade agreement with the United States took effect 1 January 2009, eliminated tariff barriers on all consumer and industrial products, and also provided strong protections for foreign businesses investing in Oman. Tourism, another source of Oman's revenue, is on the rise. A popular event is The Khareef Festival held in Salalah, Dhofar, which is 1,200 km from the capital city of Muscat, during the monsoon season (August) and is similar to Muscat Festival. During this latter event the mountains surrounding Salalah are popular with tourists as a result of the cool weather and lush greenery, rarely found anywhere else in Oman. B:If you were flying over Oman in a plane and looked down at it, would you see a lot of green? Answer: principle
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. By contrast, epidemiological studies looking for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, have shown that people who use cell phones more often actually exhibited less brain cancer than those who didn't own a phone, but were otherwise essentially identical in other regards, which thus demonstrates that any effect, even if it exists, cannot be large. B:Does the passage still leave open the possibility that cell phones could be dangerous, but that the effect has been hidden by medical advances that have reduced brain-cancer from other causes? Answer: principle
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. It would be impossible to run epidemiological studies to look for a relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer development, because the wide array of confounding variables would make any possible outcome so unreliable as to be practically inconclusive, so epidemiologists can only point to declining brain-cancer rates in general in rich countries that had widespread cellphone use, along with laboratory studies on mice which have never shown tumor growth as a result of cell phone emissions, and say that the effect, if it exists, cannot be a large one. B:Would you say, reasonably, that the WHO's cautious stance is at least somewhat warranted, since it has not been contradicted by any scientific data? Answer: principle
A:The World Health Organization has classified radio frequency electromagnetic radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. This group contains possible carcinogens such as lead, DDT, and styrene. Epidemiologists have run studies to try to find any relationship between the development of tumors in the brain and use of cell phone during participants' lives, and these studies have not drawn firm conclusions, and have only been able to say that is any such effect exists, it can't be significantly large. B:Would you say, reasonably, that the WHO's cautious stance is at least somewhat warranted, since it has not been contradicted by any scientific data? Answer:
texas