A:In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay reiterated that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was actually quite plausible. Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is actually much smaller in diameter and easier to break up than the comet in the movie, which is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein." B:If we take Michael Bay at his word when he talks about the feasibility of asteroid-destroying technology at the end of the twentieth century, does it sound like NASA's disclaimer at the end of the movie was simply just a piece of legal boilerplate rather than an actual denial of what the movie implied? Answer: where
A:Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist Likud Party) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and refused to make any counter-offer. He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet." B:Is it likely that Arafat was an easy person to negotiate with? Answer: disorders
A:In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay reiterated that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was actually quite plausible. Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is actually much smaller in diameter and easier to break up than the comet in the movie, which is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein." B:Does the passage make it sound like NASA in the 2020s or 2030s could actually conduct a mission that mimics the events of the movie, on an asteroid that is known to pose no risk, as a test for a future in which such measures might actually be necessary? Answer: where
A:Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist Likud Party) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and dismissed making an immediate counter-offer. He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet." B:Is it likely that Arafat was an easy person to negotiate with? Answer: disorders
A:Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist Likud Party) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and refused to make any counter-offer. He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet." B:Does it seem like Arafat was intent on reaching a resolution as quickly as possible? Answer: disorders
A:In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay proclaimed that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was far from unrealistic, even at the time . Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is much smaller in diameter, and thus more manageable, while the comet in the movie is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein." B:Does the passage make it sound like NASA in the 2020s or 2030s could actually conduct a mission that mimics the events of the movie, on an asteroid that is known to pose no risk, as a test for a future in which such measures might actually be necessary? Answer: where
A:Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist Likud Party) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and dismissed making an immediate counter-offer. He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet." B:Is there a good chance that Barak's offer caused Arafat to want to stop the negotiations altogether. Answer: disorders
A:In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay proclaimed that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was far from unrealistic, even at the time . Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is much smaller in diameter, and thus more manageable, while the comet in the movie is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein." B:If we take Michael Bay at his word when he talks about the feasibility of asteroid-destroying technology at the end of the twentieth century, does it sound like NASA's disclaimer at the end of the movie was simply just a piece of legal boilerplate rather than an actual denial of what the movie implied? Answer: where
A:Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist Likud Party) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and dismissed making an immediate counter-offer. He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet." B:Does it seem like Arafat was intent on reaching a resolution as quickly as possible? Answer:
disorders