A:The Highways Agency, in collaboration with BAA, also proposed complementary plans for the Stansted Airport expansion project with regards to access from the M11, and one of these plans (shown above under "Junctions 6-8") was ruled to be unnecessary, while the other plan, which includes spur road and junction additions, is awaiting government approval, which may be granted if the airport itself is expanded. B:If the airport expansion were to take place, does it sound like the government is expecting more traffic congestion on the M11 highway, rather than mostly just on the smaller surface roads? Answer: holocaust
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which has been deemed critically necessary (Junctions 6–8, see above) and the other of which, including spur road and junction additions may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place. B:If the airport expansion were to take place, does it sound like the government is expecting more traffic congestion on the M11 highway, rather than mostly just on the smaller surface roads? Answer: interactive
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which--see Junctions 6–8 above--may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place, while the other, which included spur road and junction additions, was deemed unnecessary. B:If the airport expansion were to take place, does it sound like the government is expecting more traffic congestion on the M11 highway, rather than mostly just on the smaller surface roads? Answer: interactive
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which has been deemed critically necessary (Junctions 6–8, see above) and the other of which, including spur road and junction additions may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place. B:Since airport expansions are nearly always controversial, if we assume that this project faced public opposition, would you say that the opposition was more likely to come from frustrations at current levels of highway traffic, rather than worries about future traffic buildups on the roads? Answer: interactive
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which has been deemed critically necessary (Junctions 6–8, see above) and the other of which, including spur road and junction additions may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place. B:From the information given above, does it sound like highway and surface road congestion around the airport was generally considered to be sufficient, given the level of traffic in and out of the airport at the time the passage was written? Answer: holocaust
A:The Highways Agency, in collaboration with BAA, also proposed complementary plans for the Stansted Airport expansion project with regards to access from the M11, and one of these plans (shown above under "Junctions 6-8") was ruled to be unnecessary, while the other plan, which includes spur road and junction additions, is awaiting government approval, which may be granted if the airport itself is expanded. B:Since airport expansions are nearly always controversial, if we assume that this project faced public opposition, would you say that the opposition was more likely to come from frustrations at current levels of highway traffic, rather than worries about future traffic buildups on the roads? Answer: holocaust
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which--see Junctions 6–8 above--may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place, while the other, which included spur road and junction additions, was deemed unnecessary. B:Since airport expansions are nearly always controversial, if we assume that this project faced public opposition, would you say that the opposition was more likely to come from frustrations at current levels of highway traffic, rather than worries about future traffic buildups on the roads? Answer: holocaust
A:By way of complementary plans for proposed expansion of Stansted Airport, the Highways Agency collaborated with BAA on improvements to transport access to the airport including two proposals for the M11, one of which--see Junctions 6–8 above--may be approved by the government if Stansted expansion takes place, while the other, which included spur road and junction additions, was deemed unnecessary. B:From the information given above, does it sound like highway and surface road congestion around the airport was generally considered to be sufficient, given the level of traffic in and out of the airport at the time the passage was written? Answer: interactive
A:The Highways Agency, in collaboration with BAA, also proposed complementary plans for the Stansted Airport expansion project with regards to access from the M11, and one of these plans (shown above under "Junctions 6-8") was ruled to be unnecessary, while the other plan, which includes spur road and junction additions, is awaiting government approval, which may be granted if the airport itself is expanded. B:From the information given above, does it sound like highway and surface road congestion around the airport was generally considered to be sufficient, given the level of traffic in and out of the airport at the time the passage was written? Answer:
interactive