A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, there is a lack of personal blame for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Is it better to make a judgement or hold off on doing so if you don't have all the necessary information? Answer: handhelds
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, that one can should be blamed for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Can it be inferred that one should be motivated to do good? Answer: scott
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, that one can not be blamed for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Can it be inferred that one should be motivated to do good? Answer: handhelds
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, there is a lack of personal blame for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Do pure intentions mean a harmful act should be forgiven? Answer: handhelds
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, that one can not be blamed for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Is it better to make a judgement or hold off on doing so if you don't have all the necessary information? Answer: handhelds
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, that one can not be motivated to do good if they are blamed for mistaken judgments. B:Can it be inferred that one should be motivated to do good? Answer: scott
A:Another consequentialist version is motive consequentialism, which looks at whether the state of affairs that results from the motive to choose an action is better or at least as good as each of the alternative state of affairs that would have resulted from alternative actions. This version gives relevance to the motive of an act and links it to its consequences. An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. A possible inference is, that one can should be blamed for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good. B:Do pure intentions mean a harmful act should be forgiven? Answer: scott
A:The leaching of highly water soluble tannins from decaying vegetation and leaves along a stream may produce what is known as a blackwater river. Water flowing out of bogs has a characteristic brown color from dissolved peat tannins. The presence of tannins (or humic acid) in well water can make it smell bad or taste bitter, but this does not make it unsafe to drink. B:Given what we know about tannins in well water, should we also be concerned about high levels of tannins that can be found in red wine, after leaching into the undiluted juice from grape skins? Answer: scott
A:In the 1850s an attempt was made in Utah by the LDS Church-owned Deseret Manufacturing Company to grow and process sugar beets, that failed for several reasons. First, the beet seeds they imported from France were not able to produce much sugar in the heavily salinized soil of Utah. Second, the cost of importing the beet seed from France consumed any possibility for profit. Finally, even though the people running the factory knew how to properly separate the sugar from the beet pulp, they could not obtain the chemicals necessary to perform that operation. B:If, in a pair of latter-day miracles, the company had been able to find suitable soil and also secure a steady supply of affordable seeds, would the factories and the labor pool already be prepared to start refining sugar, just as soon as the harvest was ready? Answer:
scott