With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "DON'T KNOW", "NO" or "YES".
text_A: Berlusconi was expected to start serving his four-year prison sentence in mid-October 2013 (it was reduced to one year, but which could be re-extended if the billionaire allowed his nominal court fines to go unpaid), and it would consist of either house arrest or social community service for the statutory minimum wage. In mid-October he informed the court that he preferred to serve the sentence by doing community service. Because of bureaucracy in the legal court system, it was however expected his one-year-long full-time community service would only start in around April 2014. On 19 October, the Milan appeal court ruled that Berlusconi's public office ban should be reduced from five to two years; which was later also confirmed by the Court of Cassation. The court imposed this public office ban, however this did not change the fact that Berlusconi according to the "Severino law" received a ban preventing him from running as a candidate in legislative elections for a prolonged six-year period, which effectively superseded the shorter court imposed public office ban. Berlusconi began his community service at a Catholic care home centre on 9 May 2014, where he is required to work four hours a week for a year with elderly dementia patients.
text_B: Despite the fact imprisonment or even just enforcing house arrest would no doubt be even more expensive, could political pundits make the genuine argument that their government shouldn't be spending taxpayer money to compensate a billionaire criminal for what should have been volunteer work?
YES.