A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." An error was made by Madison in his criticisms, when he claimed that Hamilton incorrectly ascribed No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay indeed wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list? Answer: introducing
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." Madison's list, however, erroneously declared that Hamilton himself had claimed credit for No. 54 when in fact, it was well known (even to Hamilton) that Jay wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity? Answer: will
A:But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively. A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models. All these difficulties were in addition to the lack of big training data and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition. B:If the big training data of 2010 was available in the 1990s, would speech recognition researchers have made great progress? Answer: will
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." It is well known that Hamilton made an error in his own list, attributing No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay wrote No. 64—and this provided some evidence for Madison's suggestion. B:If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity? Answer: introducing
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." Madison's list, however, erroneously declared that Hamilton himself had claimed credit for No. 54 when in fact, it was well known (even to Hamilton) that Jay wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list? Answer: introducing
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." Madison's list, however, erroneously declared that Hamilton himself had claimed credit for No. 54 when in fact, it was well known (even to Hamilton) that Jay wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers? Answer: will
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." An error was made by Madison in his criticisms, when he claimed that Hamilton incorrectly ascribed No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay indeed wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity? Answer: introducing
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." An error was made by Madison in his criticisms, when he claimed that Hamilton incorrectly ascribed No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay indeed wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion. B:From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers? Answer: will
A:Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." It is well known that Hamilton made an error in his own list, attributing No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay wrote No. 64—and this provided some evidence for Madison's suggestion. B:From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers? Answer:
introducing