With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "DON'T KNOW", "NO" or "YES".
text_A: The initial marketing of the film was done by TriStar Pictures, which presented the film in a vague, dramatic fashion with none of the action sequences. The trailer did not score well with test audiences. When Schwarzenegger saw the trailer, he felt it cheapened the film, and made contact with Peter Guber, his friend who was the head of Sony Pictures which owned TriStar, to work out how to improve the film's marketing. Guber brought in the firm of Cimarron-Bacon-O’Brien, which had done trailers for "The Empire Strikes Back" and "The Terminator", to produce a new trailer, focusing more on the action-oriented parts of "Total Recall" with heavy emphasis on Schwarzenegger's role. The new trailer was much more successful with test audiences, and translated to a box office on its first three days of opening.
text_B: Some decades later, when Schwarzenegger had a starring role in the movie "Maggie" which takes place during a zombie apocalypse but is actually trying to be a touching character study that portrays the heartbreak of losing a daughter to a virus, would he have been justified in choosing Cimarron-Bacon-O’Brien to create a suitable trailer for this movie, given the way they had emphasized story over action (or vice versa) when marketing "Total Recall"?
NO.