/CompCert

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C99 for-loop defined variable gets incorrect scope #211

Closed
MarcelAtSolidSands opened this Issue Dec 11, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@MarcelAtSolidSands @bschommer
@MarcelAtSolidSands

MarcelAtSolidSands commented Dec 11, 2017

We found a run-time error with SuperTest for the program below. The program should print 100 for the value of 'press', but when compiled with CompCert 3.1 on an x86 Apple Mac, it prints 3. It looks like CompCert is confused about the scopes of the two variables called 'press'.

===========================================

#include <stdio.h>

int press = 100;
int valve = 0;

int main (void) {
for (int press = 0; press < 3; press++) {
valve++;
}
printf ("Value of 'press' should be 100, is: %d\n", press);
return valve - 3;
}

bschommer added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017

@bschommer
Do not pass the env back from for stmt decls. (#42) 
* Do not pass the env back from for stmt decls.

This is the source of issue #211, the environment from the elaboration of
the declaration and expressions in the for loop should not be passed back.
Verified
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with a verified signature using GitHub’s key.
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23 Learn about signing commits
6753e8f
@bschommer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bschommer

bschommer Dec 12, 2017

Member

Should be fixed by 6753e8f
Member

bschommer commented Dec 12, 2017

Should be fixed by 6753e8f

@bschommer bschommer closed this Dec 12, 2017

xavierleroy added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2018

@xavierleroy
Add regression test for issue #211
2966858
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment