Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Joint Estimation Enhancement to ActivitySim #497

Open
bettinardi opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Joint Estimation Enhancement to ActivitySim #497

bettinardi opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Feature New feature or request

Comments

@bettinardi
Copy link

The Oregon Modeling Steering Collaborative (OMSC) is currently designing a statewide survey (across all MPOs), as Oregon has done over the last several decades. As this survey is being completed, OMSC has interest in completing a joint ActivitySim estimation across all MPO model regions in the state (or as many regions as possible). The current understanding of the estimation feature in ActivitySim is that it is only geared for one ActivitySim implementation at a time (one model region). OMSC's effort would require an expansion/enhancement to the existing ActivitySim estimation feature to allow estimation to occur across multiple ActivitySim implementations (regions).

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor

@bettinardi discussed this effort on the 10/19/21 call,

  • May be some kind of bundler of multiple estimation data bundles (EDBs) across model setups
  • Or a way to point larch to multiple directories of data (EDBs) for joint estimation
  • Larch already does some of this so it feels doable
  • May need to make improvements to estimation mode, like sampling of destinations and times-of-days and figure out a way to deal with data conflicts across setups (like multiple TAZ 1000s)
  • ODOT will share progress with the agency partners as the effort progresses

@jfdman jfdman added the Feature New feature or request label Nov 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants