New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add content blocking proxy settings #1228
Comments
socks5 will not? or will this be for the future? |
|
Transparent Proxy for routers with iptables?just need to listen the port,i will do the iptables config in my luci project |
Not at first. But in the future -- of course, we'll add both of these options. |
|
@ArchiveBase yeah, I guess we can use either this one or #391 |
|
Support for socks5 proxy is very important. Thanks a lot. |
|
Issues' i thought to mention
|
|
Would this work with a proxy of http://wl.is/ .js file provided by https://www.weblockapp.com by any chance? |
|
+1 |
|
I'm a bit confused. #391 was closed because it appears tracking of the issue transitioned to this one. One of the posts indicates you had to create https://github.com/AdguardTeam/gomitmproxy and people can try an early release via https://github.com/AdguardTeam/urlfilter/tree/master/cmd Is there an up-to-date quickstart guide that explains how to use AdGuardHome with custom CA proxy? |
|
@mrbluecoat it's not yet integrated into AGH so the only way to experiment with the proxy is to follow the instruction there: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/urlfilter/tree/master/cmd I.e. you'd need to build it yourself. |
|
Is it feasible to add a VPN server to which all local devices would connect to and that's how HTTPS filtering would work? Just as it happens in AdGuard applications. I guess that would be more sorted than configuring proxy on each device. Moreover, VPN would enable AdGuard Home to deal with IP addresses (for devices connected through VPN) and hence support for firewall rules are also possible. |
|
Looking forward to the feature going live, two years have passed. . |
|
Hi, in https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki/Configuration#configuration-file, is I have tested and it won't work reliably |
|
@jm33-m0 |
So it means all upstream DNS (over HTTPS) requests will go through the proxy configured in I turned to used other solutions in the end, two AGH servers, one of which is used as upstream for the other, both in the same VPN so not affected by DNS poisoning. |
|
Hello. I just saw this thread. |
|
Héllo, is it still not integrated in AGH ? |
|
Nope, not yet integrated. I'll be really-really happy if we do that until the end of the year. |
|
insane function! |
|
When to integrate this feature?It was postponed many times and I cant wait. |
|
+1 |
|
good job |
|
If you cannot wait -- do it yourself. |
Thanks... |
|
Any progress on this? |
|
Is this feature going to implement soon? Thanks! |
This plan keeps being postponed |
We're going to add the proxy module in v0.102:
#391
Here's the necessary minimum that should be configurable:
/#filters)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: