Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allowing to customize notEqual in readable, writable and derived functions #48

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2022

Conversation

divdavem
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #48 (1478e80) into master (fee1f55) will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.78%   98.85%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         165      174       +9     
  Branches       29       32       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          163      172       +9     
  Partials        2        2              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.ts 98.85% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@divdavem divdavem changed the title feat: allowing to customize notEqual in readable and writable functions feat: allowing to customize notEqual in readable, writable and derived functions Sep 16, 2022
@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the notEqual branch 4 times, most recently from 5c25727 to b43212b Compare September 16, 2022 13:23
Copy link
Contributor

@fbasso fbasso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @divdavem !

@divdavem
Copy link
Member Author

@fbasso Thank you for your review!

@divdavem divdavem merged commit b3e19b5 into AmadeusITGroup:master Sep 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants