Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weird behaviour from fluid annihilation planes #3899

Closed
FelixLouis opened this issue Jan 7, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@FelixLouis
Copy link

commented Jan 7, 2019

Case of an annihilation plane not working when supposed to store in a fluid interface

Describe the bug

A subnetwork containing only a fluid annihilation plane (facing an infinite water source) and a fluid storage bus (facing a tank or a fluid interface) won't consider the tank/interface as valid to recieve water from the annihilation plane (and thus the plane won't work)

To Reproduce

Copy the setup in the screenshot.

Expected behavior

Additional context

screenshot of the setup: https://imgur.com/a/U8evouG
a reddit post where I describe it: https://www.reddit.com/r/feedthebeast/comments/adjyxm/applied_energistics_how_do_annihilation_planes/

Environment

Gregblock Modpack

  • Minecraft Version: 1.12.2
  • AE2 Version: rv6-stable-4
  • Forge Version: 14-23-5-2768
@Ommina

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jan 8, 2019

#3767 -- I think?

If so, this is fixed in stable-5. If possible, try upgrading your version of AE2 and see if the issue persists.

@yueh

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jan 8, 2019

@Ommina Nope, unrelated. Or at least a follow up bug.

Basically the flag for a configured fluid interface is not set, thus it will expose the whole network inventory and thus allow it to be completely filled.
So it just needs to behave like the item interface, once a slot/tank is set to keep a certain item/fluid, it will expose the the local inventory and no longer the network one.

@yueh yueh added the type-bug label Jan 8, 2019

yueh added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2019

@yueh yueh closed this in 46355a4 Jan 15, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.