Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAny chance of a more recent release? #1182
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
phillipp
Sep 19, 2016
I would second this. I think it may be a good point right now to do some polish and release a stable version. The project looks pretty abandoned right now and if it would look a little more active (and this inclused releases as this is the thing a lot of people look first when having a glance at a project) with new releases.
Any ideas from the maintainers? @primalmotion?
phillipp
commented
Sep 19, 2016
•
|
I would second this. I think it may be a good point right now to do some polish and release a stable version. The project looks pretty abandoned right now and if it would look a little more active (and this inclused releases as this is the thing a lot of people look first when having a glance at a project) with new releases. Any ideas from the maintainers? @primalmotion? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ikus060
Oct 9, 2016
Well, the project seam dead. Last release, beta 6, was publish in March 2013. And last activities in git is 6 month old. It's really sad, archipel seam to have a good potential.
ikus060
commented
Oct 9, 2016
|
Well, the project seam dead. Last release, beta 6, was publish in March 2013. And last activities in git is 6 month old. It's really sad, archipel seam to have a good potential. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
phillipp
Oct 9, 2016
@ikus060 not sure, because when I tried archipel I could not find a bug and the project seems feature complete. It may be just done and working fine.... It's possible that it only looks abandoned but isn't.
phillipp
commented
Oct 9, 2016
|
@ikus060 not sure, because when I tried archipel I could not find a bug and the project seems feature complete. It may be just done and working fine.... It's possible that it only looks abandoned but isn't. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ikus060
commented
Oct 9, 2016
|
Then will see how long it take for a maintainer to reply to this issue... |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
CyrilPeponnet
Oct 9, 2016
Member
It's not abandoned and I'm using it on nearly 400 hypervisors. Not features complete either but hard to find the time and the people to contribute to.
|
It's not abandoned and I'm using it on nearly 400 hypervisors. Not features complete either but hard to find the time and the people to contribute to. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ikus060
Oct 9, 2016
It's really nice to get a reply! Back to the issue. Any chance to get a new release?
ikus060
commented
Oct 9, 2016
|
It's really nice to get a reply! Back to the issue. Any chance to get a new release? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Master is the release ;) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
phillipp
Oct 10, 2016
@CyrilPeponnet I think one large problem is, that the project just looks dead. There is no recent release (regardless of what changed) and there isn't even a "THIS PROJECT IS NOT DEAD" info in the Readme. If you want to get for contributors, you need someone who uses this project first. But this won't happen with this strategy, I think. So again, I'd propose tagging a release so at least peoply try this project out. And only THEN you can get contributors. Tagging a release takes a few minutes but will be a game changer for how the project looks like regarding the maintainer situation.
phillipp
commented
Oct 10, 2016
|
@CyrilPeponnet I think one large problem is, that the project just looks dead. There is no recent release (regardless of what changed) and there isn't even a "THIS PROJECT IS NOT DEAD" info in the Readme. If you want to get for contributors, you need someone who uses this project first. But this won't happen with this strategy, I think. So again, I'd propose tagging a release so at least peoply try this project out. And only THEN you can get contributors. Tagging a release takes a few minutes but will be a game changer for how the project looks like regarding the maintainer situation. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
K1773R
Oct 10, 2016
yes master is, but the python build via pip is horribly outdated. most will use that and be disappointed.
K1773R
commented
Oct 10, 2016
•
|
yes master is, but the python build via pip is horribly outdated. most will use that and be disappointed. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
phillipp
Oct 10, 2016
Maybe we just open a pull request with a new package definition so everybody can install the current master (best would be with a git tag) from pip/pypi? unfortunately I have absolutely no idea how this works in python (ruby dev myself).
phillipp
commented
Oct 10, 2016
|
Maybe we just open a pull request with a new package definition so everybody can install the current master (best would be with a git tag) from pip/pypi? unfortunately I have absolutely no idea how this works in python (ruby dev myself). |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
paradisaeidae
Sep 2, 2017
Agree with phillipp. Any chance of ripping out dependencies on python, replace with dependencies of Ruby?
paradisaeidae
commented
Sep 2, 2017
|
Agree with phillipp. Any chance of ripping out dependencies on python, replace with dependencies of Ruby? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ikus060
Sep 2, 2017
If you look at git history you will notice this project is dead. Latest commit is years old. I really recommend you to use a different product to manage your VM. The best one I found is Proxmox. It really worth a try and provide business grade feature like flexible storage, clustering, etc.
ikus060
commented
Sep 2, 2017
|
If you look at git history you will notice this project is dead. Latest commit is years old. I really recommend you to use a different product to manage your VM. The best one I found is Proxmox. It really worth a try and provide business grade feature like flexible storage, clustering, etc. |
Vaelatern commentedJun 1, 2016
Thank you!