Skip to content

Conversation

@jwdinius
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jwdinius jwdinius force-pushed the fix_appveyor branch 2 times, most recently from 35d10ed to a081362 Compare January 10, 2019 02:58
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 10, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 701

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 83.818%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
PathPlanning/RRTStarReedsShepp/rrt_star_reeds_shepp.py 2 85.08%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 686: 0.2%
Covered Lines: 6687
Relevant Lines: 7978

💛 - Coveralls

@jwdinius jwdinius force-pushed the fix_appveyor branch 9 times, most recently from 395f84b to 0857806 Compare January 10, 2019 05:03
@jwdinius jwdinius changed the title WIP: fix appveyor fix appveyor Jan 10, 2019
@jwdinius
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was able to use the conda environment definition from the repo's environment.yml file to install all dependencies within that conda environment. This fixes the broken appveyor ci. All CI checks pass now.

@AtsushiSakai
Copy link
Owner

@jwdinius Hi. Thank you for your PR. I’m sorry my laptop is broken now, I will check it later.

@AtsushiSakai AtsushiSakai merged commit 00ce431 into AtsushiSakai:master Jan 12, 2019
@AtsushiSakai
Copy link
Owner

@jwdinius Great!!.

@AtsushiSakai
Copy link
Owner

AtsushiSakai commented Jan 12, 2019

Close #154

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants