Skip to content

expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') now passes. #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 4, 2012

2 participants

@vlazzle
vlazzle commented Jan 17, 2012

More consistent with previous behavior, since before
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.own.property('a') passed but
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') failed

Also less surprising in general since before
expect( 'a' in { a: undefined } ).to.be.ok() passed but
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') failed

@vlazzle vlazzle expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') now passes.
More consistent with previous behavior, since before
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.own.property('a') passed but
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') failed

Also less surprising in general since before
expect( 'a' in { a: undefined } ).to.be.ok() passed but
expect({ a: undefined }).to.have.property('a') failed
2c8f4c5
@vlazzle
vlazzle commented Jan 30, 2012

bump :)

@rauchg rauchg merged commit 0b856ac into Automattic:master Feb 4, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.