Switch branches/tags
Find file Copy path
751 lines (544 sloc) 26.3 KB

JavaScript Coding Guidelines


Use spacing liberally throughout your code. “When in doubt, space it out.”

These rules encourage liberal spacing for improved developer readability. The minification process creates a file that is optimized for browsers to read and process.

  • Indentation with tabs.
  • No whitespace at the end of line or on blank lines.
  • Lines should usually be no longer than 80 characters, and should not exceed 100 (counting tabs as 4 spaces). This is a “soft” rule, but long lines generally indicate unreadable or disorganized code.
  • if/else/for/while/try blocks should always use braces, and always go on multiple lines.
  • Unary special-character operators (e.g., ++, --) must not have space next to their operand.
  • Any , and ; must not have preceding space.
  • Any ; used as a statement terminator must be at the end of the line.
  • Any : after a property name in an object definition must not have preceding space.
  • The ? and : in a ternary conditional must have space on both sides.
  • No filler spaces in empty constructs (e.g., {}, [], fn()).
  • There should be a new line at the end of each file.
  • Any ! negation operator should have a following space
  • All function bodies are indented by one tab, even if the entire file is wrapped in a closure
  • Spaces may align code within documentation blocks or within a line, but only tabs should be used at the start of a line

Don't forget to remove trailing whitespace.

We specify an EditorConfig configuration and encourage you to install a plugin for your editor to simplify following many of our spacing guidelines.


Object declarations can be made on a single line if they are short (remember the line length guidelines). When an object declaration is too long to fit on one line, there must be one property per line. Property names only need to be quoted if they are reserved words or contain special characters:

// Bad
const labels = { facebook: 'Facebook',
	twitter: 'Twitter', 'google-plus': 'Google Plus' };
// Acceptable for small objects
const labels = { 'google-plus': 'Google Plus' };
// Good
const labels = {
	facebook: 'Facebook',
	twitter: 'Twitter',
	'google-plus': 'Google Plus'

Arrays and Function Calls

Always include extra spaces around elements and arguments:

const array = [ a, b ];

foo( arg );

foo( 'string', object );

foo( options, object[ property ] );

foo( node, 'property', 2 );

// Unlike the WordPress core standards, we always add a single space
// around object literals and callbacks.
foo( {
	a: 'alpha',
	b: 'beta'
} );

foo( data, () => {
	// Do stuff
} );

Examples of Good Spacing

if ( condition ) {
	doSomething( 'with a string' );
} else if ( otherCondition ) {
	otherThing( {
		key: value,
		otherKey: otherValue
	} );
} else {
	somethingElse( true );

while ( ! condition ) {

for ( let i = 0; i < 100; i++ ) {
	object[ array[ i ] ] = someFn( i );

try {
	// Expressions
} catch ( e ) {
	// Expressions


Use them. Never rely on Automatic Semicolon Insertion (ASI).

Indentation and Line Breaks

Indentation and line breaks add readability to complex statements.

Tabs should be used for indentation.

Try to return early from a function to avoid functions with deep indentation akin to "Callback Hell".

// Bad
function isFreshData( data ) {
	let isFresh;
	if ( data ) {
		if ( data.timestamp > - ( 20 * 60 * 1000 ) ) {
			isFresh = true;
		} else {
			isFresh = false;
	} else {
		isFresh = false;

	return isFresh;
// Good
function isFreshData( data ) {
	if ( data && data.timestamp > - ( 20 * 60 * 1000 ) ) {
		return true;

	return false;

Blocks and Curly Braces

if, else, for, while, and try blocks should always use braces, and always go on multiple lines. The opening brace should be on the same line as the function definition, the conditional, or the loop. The closing brace should be on the line directly following the last statement of the block.

if ( isLarge() ) {
	// Expressions
} else if ( isMedium() ) {
	// Expressions
} else {
	// Expressions

When all paths of a set of if or else if statements return a value, do not include an else block.

// Bad
function getStatusLabel() {
	if ( isValid() ) {
		return 'OK';
	} else {
		return 'Not OK';

// Good
function getStatusLabel() {
	if ( isValid() ) {
		return 'OK';

	return 'Not OK';

Multi-line Statements

When a statement is too long to fit on one line, line breaks must occur after an operator.

// Bad
const sumLabel = 'The sum of ' + a + ' and ' + b + ' plus ' + c
	+ ' is ' + ( a + b + c );
// Good
const sumLabel = 'The sum of ' + a + ' and ' + b + ' plus ' + c +
	' is ' + ( a + b + c );

When a conditional is too long to fit on one line, successive lines should be indented one extra level to distinguish them from the body.

if ( firstCondition() && secondCondition() &&
		thirdCondition() ) {

Assignments and Globals

Variable Declarations

When possible, variables should be declared using a const declaration. Use let only when you anticipate that the variable value will be reassigned during runtime. var should not be used in any new code.

Note that const does not protect against mutations to an object, so do not use it as an indicator of immutability.

const foo = {}; = true;

let counter = 0;


Globals should almost never be used. If they are used or you need to reference a pre-existing global do so via window.

let userId;
if ( typeof window !== 'undefined' ) {
	userId = get( window, 'currentUser.ID' );

Note that because parts of our application are rendered on the server, we cannot always assume that a window global is present. Therefore, if you must reference a window global, always perform a typeof check to verify that it exists.

Naming Conventions

Variable and function names should be full words, using camel case with a lowercase first letter. This also applies to abbreviations and acronyms.

// Bad
let userIDToDelete;
let siteURL;
// Good
let userIdToDelete;
let siteUrl;

Names should be descriptive, but not excessively so. Exceptions are allowed for iterators, such as the use of i to represent the index in a loop.

Constructors intended for use with new should have a capital first letter (UpperCamelCase).

Variables intended to be used as a constant can be defined with the SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE naming convention. Note that while any variable declared using const could be considered a constant, in the context of our application this usage should usually be limited to top-level or exported module values.

const DUMMY_VALUE = 10;

function getIncrementedDummyValue() {
	const incrementedValue = DUMMY_VALUE + 1;
	return incrementedValue;


Comments come before the code to which they refer, and should always be preceded by a blank line unless inserted as the first line in a block statement. Capitalize the first letter of the comment, and include a period at the end when writing full sentences. There must be a single space between the comment token (//) and the comment text.

Single line comments:


// Explanation of something complex on the next line document.querySelectorAll( 'p' ), doSomething );

When adding documentation, use the jsdoc format.

 * Represents a book.
 * @constructor
 * @param {string} title - The title of the book.
 * @param {string} author - The author of the book.
function Book( title, author ) {


Multi-line comments that are not a jsdoc comment should use //:

// This is a comment that is long enough to warrant being stretched
// over the span of multiple lines.


Strict equality checks (===) must be used in favor of abstract equality checks (==). The only exception is when checking for both undefined and null by way of null, though it is preferable to use Lodash's isNil for this purpose.

// Check that 'someValue' is either undefined or null, for some important reason.

// Good
if ( someValue == null ) {

// better
if ( isNil( someValue ) ) {

Type Checks

When checking the type of a value, use one of the following utilities from Lodash: These are the preferred ways of checking the type of a value:

As mentioned earlier, you should avoid referencing global values without first validating their presence. Calling isUndefined( someGlobalValue ) would throw a ReferenceError if that value doesn't exist. Instead, fall back to checking with typeof window !== 'undefined' for global values.

Note that we don't recommend using isObject to check that a value is an object. This is because non-plain-object types (arrays, regexes and others) test as true for this check.

Though these are the recommended type checks, you generally don't have to know the type of an object. Instead, prefer testing the object's existence and shape over its type.

Existence and Shape Checks

Prefer using the power of "truthy" in JavaScript boolean expressions to validate the existence and shape of an object to using typeof.

The following are all false in boolean expressions:

  • null
  • undefined
  • '' the empty string
  • 0 the number

But be careful, because these are all true:

  • '0' the string
  • [] the empty array
  • {} the empty object
  • -1 the number

To test the existence of an object (including arrays):

if ( object ) { ... }

To test if a property exists on an object, regardless of value, including undefined or other falsey values:

// Good:
if ( 'desired' in object ) { ... }

// Better, using Lodash's `has` function:
if ( has( object, 'desired' ) ) { ... }

To test if a property is present and has a truthy value:

if ( object.desired ) { ... }

To test if an object exists and has a property:

// Good:
if ( object && 'desired' in object ) { ... }
if ( object && object.desired ) { ... }

// Better, using Lodash's `has` function:
if ( has( object, 'desired' ) ) { ... }

// Note: 'has' will safely return `false` if a value is missing at any point in the nesting.
// Even if the chain breaks at 'b' 'has' will return false, rather than throwing an error.
if ( has( object, 'a.b.c.desired' ) ) { ... }

Note that the in operator checks all inherited properties of an object prototype, which can lead to some unexpected scenarios, so should be avoided:

'valueOf' in {}; // true

Instead, use has or Object#hasOwnProperty.

{}.hasOwnProperty( 'valueOf' ); // false
has( {}, 'valueOf' ); // false

has and Object#hasOwnProperty are also recommended for testing the presence of an object key using variable input:

const key = 'someParam';
const object = {
	someParam: 'someValue'

object.hasOwnProperty( key ); // true
has( object, key ); // true


Use single-quotes for string literals:

const myStr = 'strings should be contained in single quotes';

When a string contains single quotes, they need to be escaped with a backslash (\):

Double quotes can be used in cases where there is a single quote in the string or in JSX attributes.

const myStr = "You're amazing just the way you are.";

const component = <div className="post"></div>;

ES2015 template literals are available as an alternative to string concatenation when including variables in a string.

// Before
const sumLabel = 'The sum of ' + a + ' and ' + b + ' plus ' + c +
	' is ' + ( a + b + c );
// After
const sumLabel = `The sum of ${ a } and ${ b } plus ${ c } is ${ a + b + c }`;

Switch Statements

Switch statements can be useful when there are a large number of cases – especially when multiple cases can be handled by the same block (using fall-through), or the default case can be leveraged.

When using switch statements:

  • Note intentional cases of fall-through explicitly, as it is a common error to omit a break by accident.
  • Indent case statements one tab within the switch.
switch ( event.keyCode ) {

	// ENTER and SPACE both trigger x()
	case constants.keyCode.ENTER:
	case constants.keyCode.SPACE:
	case constants.keyCode.ESCAPE:

Best Practices

Variable names

The first word of a variable name should be a noun or adjective (not a verb) to avoid confusion with functions.

You can prefix a variable with verb only for boolean values when it makes code easier to read.

// Bad
const play = false;
// Good
const name = 'John';
const blueCar = new Car( 'blue' );
const shouldFlop = true;

Function names

The first word of a function name should be a verb (not a noun) to avoid confusion with variables.

// Bad
function name() {
	return 'John';
// Good
function getName() {
	return 'John';

You may prefix a function by is or has to indicate a Boolean return value.

function isValid() {
	return true;


Creating arrays in JavaScript should be done using the shorthand [] constructor rather than the new Array() notation.

const myArray = [];

You can initialize an array during construction:

const myArray = [ 1, 'WordPress', 2, 'Blog' ];

In JavaScript, associative arrays are defined as objects.


There are many ways to create objects in JavaScript. Object literal notation, {}, is both the most performant, and also the easiest to read.

const myObj = {};

Object literal notation should be used unless the object requires a specific prototype, in which case the object should be created by calling a constructor function with new.

const myObj = new ConstructorMethod();

Object properties should be accessed via dot notation, unless the key is a variable, a reserved word, or a string that would not be a valid identifier:

prop = object.propertyName;
prop = object[ variableKey ];
prop = object[ 'default' ];
prop = object[ 'key-with-hyphens' ];

That said, avoid accessing nested properties through a chain of dot notation as this can lead cause access errors. Instead, use Lodash's get function. It will safely handle cases where a property or object is missing at any point in the nesting chain.

const object = {
	nestedObject: {
		property: 'value'

// Bad
nestedProp =;
anotherNestedProp = object.nestedObject.anotherProperty; // This will throw an error

// Good
nestedProp = get( object, '' );
anotherNestedProp = get( object, 'nestedObject.anotherProperty' ); // safely returns undefined

“Yoda” Conditions

Since we require strict equality checks, we are not going to enforce Yoda conditions. You're welcome to use them, but the most important consideration should be readability of the conditional.


Starting in ECMAScript 5, JavaScript includes many methods and patterns inspired by functional programming.

We encourage you to make use of these methods in favor of traditional for and while loops:

Calypso includes polyfills for many more Array prototype methods that were added in ES2015 and beyond. You can safely use them without fear of breaking older browsers. If it's more convenient you can also use their Lodash equivalents. For example:

Introduced in ES2015, arrow functions provide a shorter syntax for function expressions while preserving the parent scope's this context. Arrow functions are especially well-suited for iteration method callbacks.


Creating an array of React elements from an array of post objects: ( post ) => (
	<Post post={ post } key={ post.global_ID } />
) );

Check whether every post in an array of post objects is published:

posts.every( ( post ) => post.status === 'publish' );

Group an array of post objects by status:

posts.reduce( ( memo, post ) => {
	memo[ post.status ] = ( memo[ post.status ] || [] ).concat( post );
	return memo;
}, {} );

Rationale: contracts in code

It could be argued that these functional helpers are not so different from for and while; after all, they are implemented with the same base loops and can't do anything that for and while can't.

map and friends are more precise ways to talk about consistent patterns in data manipulation. Preferring them over for is analogous to using the word "cake" instead of saying "the kind of food that you make by whipping egg whites and maybe adding sugar", with the benefit that map and friends are easily and legibly composable — to stretch the analogy, butter cakes are to cakes what pluck is to map.

Even assuming a comparison where map and for are used as equivalently as possible (e.g. both with the same inlined callback), with map or filter you are intentionally limiting your power. You establish a contract, wherein you say:

  • you're not going to mutate the collection;
  • (in the case of map) you're going to return a collection with the same size and with data derived from the original collection's individual items;
  • (in the case of filter) you're going to return a subset of the original collection, preserving the items and the order.

These important statements are part of the abstraction. As for the side effects:

  • map and filter prevent you from yielding side effects by default, whereas the default with for is to mutate, unless you have an additional statement to create a new empty collection beforehand;
  • for inherently requires more noise to be added, as you need to set up the conditions of the loop and handle the iterating variable. Noise dilutes intent. Noise also makes it easier for mistakes to slip through. Anything from a misspelled array.lenght, to a rogue comma or an illogical condition — ultimately, those are technicalities that you didn't actually need to care about in the first place, yet they lead to pesky bugs creeping in.

for will still have its uses, but for most scenarios we have well-known higher-level terms. With the caveat that there is such a thing as too "sophisticated" and opaque vocabulary, by continuously learning and choosing the right functional programming iterator we collectively develop the fineness of our expression as developers centered around a common project.

React components

  • Use stateless function components or the React.Component class instead of React.createClass
    • Unlike React.createClass, methods of components extending React.Component are not automatically bound to the instance. Instead, you will need to bind the functions in your component's constructor or use class instance property initializers
  • Use PropTypes to validate prop types and help set usage expectations for other developers
  • Use JSX for creating React elements, like those returned from a component's render function
  • Methods that are bound to event handlers should have descriptive names.
    • Avoid naming methods after event handlers like onClick, onSubmit, etc.
    • You can use fat arrow functions if it makes handling the event cleaner.
  • Avoid prefixing method names with _.
  • If you find that your render logic becomes complex, it might be a sign that you should split the component into separate individual components.
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';

export default class Link extends Component {
	static propTypes = {
		href: PropTypes.string,
		onNavigate: PropTypes.func,
		children: PropTypes.node

	navigate = ( event ) => {

	render() {
		const { href, children } = this.props;

		return (
			<a href={ href } onClick={ this.navigate }>
				{ children }


We support and encourage ES6 features thanks to Babel transpilation and the accompanying polyfill.


  1. ECMAScript® 2015 Language Specification
  2. Babel
  3. Overview of ECMAScript 6 features
  4. ECMAScript 6 new features overview & comparison
  5. More Resources - listed by Airbnb


To help encourage developers to follow our coding standards, we include an ESLint configuration file .eslintrc.js that configures ESLint to detect code that doesn't follow the guidelines. ESLint also catches basic syntax errors, and natively supports both ES6 and JSX. It can be extended by plugins, such as eslint-plugin-wpcalypso, which we use in our configuration.

There are integrations for many editors that will automatically detect the configuration file and run the checks.

In cases where ESLint incorrectly identifies code as not following our standards, you can disable rules using inline comments. Before disabling a rule, be certain and vocal that you understand the reason for it needing to be disabled. Our ESLint configuration is very well-tuned, and disabling a rule is not appropriate as an escape valve for poorly written code. If you don't understand or disagree with the existence of a rule, open an issue to start a discussion.

Automatically Run ESLint Against Your Changesets

If you would like to have your changes automatically run through ESLint - there is a git pre-commit hook in bin/pre-commit-hook.js that will perform the task. It will be run everytime you do a git commit.

If ESLint encounters any issues inside any .jsx or .js files you have updated, an error will be displayed, and the commit will not proceed. Here is an example of an attempted commit with the hook installed:


Running ESLint across entire project

To lint the entire project, from the root of your working directory run:

npm run lint:js

Sublime Text

These instructions assume Sublime Text 3

If you are using Sublime Text, you can use the SublimeLinter-eslint plugin to visually highlight linting errors in your code. Dan Abramov has a great instructional blog post to get up and running with ESLint in Sublime Text.

Before following these instructions, you'll want to globally install ESLint and related dependencies by running the following command in your terminal:

npm install -g eslint babel-eslint eslint-plugin-react eslint-plugin-wpcalypso eslint-config-wpcalypso

Identifying Spaces with Sublime Text

When you install the SublimeLinter package, it will identify mixed spaces and tabs in your code, but it won't identify lines whose leading characters are comprised of only spaces.

To make identifying spaces easier, you can install the Highlight Whitespaces package, then add the following user setting (Preferences > Package Settings > Highlight Whitespaces > Settings - User) so that it doesn't also highlight tabs:

	"highlight_whitespaces_check_tabs": false