Comparison of Consumption vs. App Service plan features

[SyntaxC4]

We've noticed that there is some confusion on the different Plan models:

Hopefully this can be clarified by Calvin or @dariagrigoriu

[lindydonna]

Note that classic will be renamed to "App Service Hosting Plan". See https://github.com/projectkudu/AzureFunctionsPortal/issues/586

[lindydonna]

Customer suggestion is to add a comparison table of what is and isn't supported in Dynamic vs. Classic. See Azure/azure-functions-host#538.

[ctolkien]

Fixed by now.

[davidebbo]

It should already be available for Australia East. When did you last try?

[ctolkien]

@davidebbo - was a while back. Seems to have the dynamic options now!

[ggailey777]

@christopheranderson or @davidebbo do we have this info available? If so, it's easy to add a table in this topic. Maybe that should then get linked to from the Pricing page?

[davidebbo]

The list is growing pretty quickly so doc would get out of date. I think the best way to test the list of regions that have Consumption is to look at the drop down when trying to create one.

[lindydonna]

@davidebbo @ggailey777 I think we're talking about different things. The proposal was to have a table to show the difference between feature sets in Dynamic and Consumption.

Daria and I can provide this information, but we need to compile it and it will take some time.

[davidebbo]

Yep, sorry, I thought it was able listing regions...

[ggailey777]

@lindydonna thanks. I will add you to this issue to help track this.

[ggailey777]

@SyntaxC4 were you working this comparison table? Is that what you showed me on Tuesday?

[SyntaxC4]

Blog post has gone live here: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2017/03/23/azure-app-service-web-api-mobile-ase-azure-functions-sku-comparison-matrix-2/