Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed example code for "json" function #7652

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 11, 2018
Merged

Fixed example code for "json" function #7652

merged 1 commit into from May 11, 2018

Conversation

AnalyticJeremy
Copy link
Member

The example for the "json" function was using the "parse" function.

The example for the "json" function was using the "parse" function.
@PRMerger15
Copy link
Contributor

@AnalyticJeremy : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @sharonlo101, has been notified to review your proposed change.

@AnalyticJeremy
Copy link
Member Author

#sign-off

@PRMerger17
Copy link
Contributor

@AnalyticJeremy: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @sharonlo101, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias.

@JennieHubbard
Copy link
Contributor

@AnalyticJeremy Thank you Jeremy!

#sign-off

@PRMerger19
Copy link
Contributor

@JennieHubbard: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @sharonlo101, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias.

@v-shils v-shils merged commit 55011b7 into MicrosoftDocs:master May 11, 2018
@AnalyticJeremy AnalyticJeremy deleted the patch-1 branch May 11, 2018 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants