Rename Durable commands #625
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…onCheckStatusResponse
…ationCheckStatusResponse in tests and examples
Francisco-Gamino
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2021
Contributor
Francisco-Gamino
left a comment
Francisco-Gamino
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given that the examples use the new cmdlet names, could you please add a test to validate that the alias are properly map? This would be to make sure that we do not break customer in the future.
Otherwise, LGTM.
Contributor
Author
Great idea, thank you, I'll do this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Renaming some Durable Functions commands to follow the following pattern consistently:
[Verb]-Durable[Additional qualifiers]
The old names are kept as aliases for backward-compatibility purposes.