Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs - add missing comment syntax information #223

merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2018


Copy link

Was looking for this information, took me a while to find it. A friend pointed out these docs with the crucial parts missing.

@andreasabel andreasabel self-assigned this Jan 5, 2018
@andreasabel andreasabel added this to the 2.8.2 milestone Jan 5, 2018
Copy link

Thanks, I also noticed this.

I wondered whether this part of the .rst could be created from the lbnf grammar automatically. A pandoc backend for bnfc would be something (instead of the latex backend). Or a translation from the generated .tex to .rst via pandoc.

For now, let's take your fix. Thanks!

@andreasabel andreasabel merged commit 292b612 into BNFC:master Jan 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants