From 87f67834ec77069d118e8eafc3bfaf9d19709674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Wuille Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 13:03:53 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add address_types test Summary: Improvements and cleanups by John Newbery This is from [[https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11403 | PR11403]] : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11403/commits/b224a47a1a5feac380506abff63fae91d7a93b39 We initially decided not to backport it because we don't have this feature, but it turns out it exercice various parts of the code and is useful. In addition, it makes backport easier. Also include a trick similar to [[https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17124 | PR17124]] to significantly speedup the test. Test Plan: ninja all check-all Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D6131 --- test/functional/wallet_address_types.py | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100755 test/functional/wallet_address_types.py diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_address_types.py b/test/functional/wallet_address_types.py new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..21f40be0b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/functional/wallet_address_types.py @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +# Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin Core developers +# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying +# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. +"""Test that the wallet can send and receive using all combinations of address types. + +There are 4 nodes-under-test: + - node0 uses legacy addresses + - node1 uses legacy addresses + - node2 uses legacy addresses + - node3 uses legacy addresses + +node4 exists to generate new blocks. + +The script is a series of tests, iterating over the 4 nodes. In each iteration +of the test, one node sends: + - 10/101th of its balance to itself (using getrawchangeaddress for single key addresses) + - 20/101th to the next node + - 30/101th to the node after that + - 40/101th to the remaining node + - 1/101th remains as fee+change + +Iterate over each node for single key addresses, and then over each node for +multisig addresses. In a second iteration, the same is done. As every node +sends coins after receiving, this also verifies that spending coins sent to +all these address works.""" + +from decimal import Decimal +import itertools + +from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework +from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_greater_than, connect_nodes_bi, sync_blocks, sync_mempools + + +class AddressTypeTest(BitcoinTestFramework): + def set_test_params(self): + self.num_nodes = 5 + # whitelist all peers to speed up tx relay / mempool sync + self.extra_args = [["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"]] * self.num_nodes + + def skip_test_if_missing_module(self): + self.skip_if_no_wallet() + + def setup_network(self): + self.setup_nodes() + + # Fully mesh-connect nodes for faster mempool sync + for i, j in itertools.product(range(self.num_nodes), repeat=2): + if i > j: + connect_nodes_bi(self.nodes[i], self.nodes[j]) + self.sync_all() + + def get_balances(self, confirmed=True): + """Return a list of confirmed or unconfirmed balances.""" + if confirmed: + return [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(4)] + else: + return [self.nodes[i].getunconfirmedbalance() for i in range(4)] + + def test_address(self, node, address, multisig, typ): + """Run sanity checks on an address.""" + self.log.info(address) + info = self.nodes[node].getaddressinfo(address) + assert(self.nodes[node].validateaddress(address)['isvalid']) + if not multisig and typ == 'legacy': + # P2PKH + assert(not info['isscript']) + assert('pubkey' in info) + elif typ == 'legacy': + # P2SH-multisig + assert(info['isscript']) + assert_equal(info['script'], 'multisig') + assert('pubkeys' in info) + else: + # Unknown type + assert(False) + + def run_test(self): + # Mine 101 blocks on node4 to bring nodes out of IBD and make sure that + # no coinbases are maturing for the nodes-under-test during the test + self.nodes[4].generate(101) + sync_blocks(self.nodes) + + uncompressed_1 = "0496b538e853519c726a2c91e61ec11600ae1390813a627c66fb8be7947be63c52da7589379515d4e0a604f8141781e62294721166bf621e73a82cbf2342c858ee" + uncompressed_2 = "047211a824f55b505228e4c3d5194c1fcfaa15a456abdf37f9b9d97a4040afc073dee6c89064984f03385237d92167c13e236446b417ab79a0fcae412ae3316b77" + compressed_1 = "0296b538e853519c726a2c91e61ec11600ae1390813a627c66fb8be7947be63c52" + compressed_2 = "037211a824f55b505228e4c3d5194c1fcfaa15a456abdf37f9b9d97a4040afc073" + + # addmultisigaddress with at least 1 uncompressed key should return a + # legacy address. + for node in range(4): + self.test_address(node, self.nodes[node].addmultisigaddress( + 2, [uncompressed_1, uncompressed_2])['address'], True, 'legacy') + self.test_address(node, self.nodes[node].addmultisigaddress( + 2, [compressed_1, uncompressed_2])['address'], True, 'legacy') + self.test_address(node, self.nodes[node].addmultisigaddress( + 2, [uncompressed_1, compressed_2])['address'], True, 'legacy') + # addmultisigaddress with all compressed keys should return the + # appropriate address type (even when the keys are not ours). + self.test_address(0, self.nodes[0].addmultisigaddress( + 2, [compressed_1, compressed_2])['address'], True, 'legacy') + + for multisig, from_node in itertools.product([False, True], range(4)): + self.log.info( + "Sending from node {} with{} multisig".format(from_node, "" if multisig else "out")) + old_balances = self.get_balances() + self.log.debug("Old balances are {}".format(old_balances)) + to_send = ( + old_balances[from_node] / + 101).quantize( + Decimal("0.00000001")) + sends = {} + + self.log.debug("Prepare sends") + for n, to_node in enumerate(range(from_node, from_node + 4)): + to_node %= 4 + if not multisig: + if from_node == to_node: + # When sending non-multisig to self, use + # getrawchangeaddress + address = self.nodes[to_node].getrawchangeaddress() + else: + address = self.nodes[to_node].getnewaddress() + else: + addr1 = self.nodes[to_node].getnewaddress() + addr2 = self.nodes[to_node].getnewaddress() + address = self.nodes[to_node].addmultisigaddress(2, [addr1, addr2])[ + 'address'] + + # Do some sanity checking on the created address + typ = 'legacy' + self.test_address(to_node, address, multisig, typ) + + # Output entry + sends[address] = to_send * 10 * (1 + n) + + self.log.debug("Sending: {}".format(sends)) + self.nodes[from_node].sendmany("", sends) + sync_mempools(self.nodes) + + unconf_balances = self.get_balances(False) + self.log.debug( + "Check unconfirmed balances: {}".format(unconf_balances)) + assert_equal(unconf_balances[from_node], 0) + for n, to_node in enumerate(range(from_node + 1, from_node + 4)): + to_node %= 4 + assert_equal(unconf_balances[to_node], to_send * 10 * (2 + n)) + + # node4 collects fee and block subsidy to keep accounting simple + self.nodes[4].generate(1) + sync_blocks(self.nodes) + + new_balances = self.get_balances() + self.log.debug("Check new balances: {}".format(new_balances)) + # We don't know what fee was set, so we can only check bounds on + # the balance of the sending node + assert_greater_than(new_balances[from_node], to_send * 10) + assert_greater_than(to_send * 11, new_balances[from_node]) + for n, to_node in enumerate(range(from_node + 1, from_node + 4)): + to_node %= 4 + assert_equal( + new_balances[to_node], old_balances[to_node] + to_send * 10 * (2 + n)) + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + AddressTypeTest().main()