Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Seperate Storage Types for Images and Attachments #1302
In setting up a secure Bookstack instance there's a bit of a wrinkle when it comes to secure images. Since secure images are only available with
I don't know if it's possible to do secure images over S3 so the next best thing would be to have separate storage types.
Thanks @Zeigren for the suggestion.
I think secure images over a network call (to S3) would cause trouble due to the rapid nature of image access when using the system.
Being able to define a separate storage system for attachments is a good idea though, and something I imagine would be useful to many others.
changed the title
[Request] Secure Images for S3 and/or Seperate Storage Types for Images and Attachments
Feb 28, 2019
Now included in master to be in the next release.
If you're changing an existing storage_type in use, you'll need to migrate your content first to the new storage system. The docs detail locations of files for various storage systems:
Thanks again for the feature request.