Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upTracking issue for libz blitz evaluation of walkdir #47
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I've added some PRs to a list of non-breaking changes so we can look at merging those in and doing a point-release before I'm not sure what strategy you had @BurntSushi for splitting the changes between breaking and non-breaking. Maybe we can do some git flow by making a EDIT: Alternatively we could just not worry about breaking/non-breaking and pool everything up for |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Yes, I'd prefer this route. Let's not do more work than we need to. :-) If need be, we can branch off of the |
KodrAus commentedJun 14, 2017
•
edited
This is the tracking issue for the evaluation performed by the libs team this week.
Add Error docs to methods that return Result
Use
?in docs instead of unwrappingAdd example for content_first
Add links to other walkdir items in DirEntry docs
Add links to other walkdir items in Iter and IterFilterEntry docs
Add links to other walkdir items in WalkDir docs
Add links to other walkdir items in WalkDirIterator docs
Document that
IterandIterFilterEntryare the result of trait methodsCorrect errors in WalkDir type docs
Add html_root_url attribute
Implement Debug for WalkDir, Iter and IterFilterEntry
Add build badges to Cargo.toml
Add categories to Cargo.toml
Rename Iter to IntoIter
Rename IterFilterEntry to FilterEntry
Link references to std in docs
Make skip_current_dir and filter_entry inherent methods
Make WalkDir Send + Sync
Document why unwraps won't fail
Remove re-export of is_same_file
Move DirEntry::ino method to an extension trait
Implement Clone for WalkDir