Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

36 Open 0 Closed
36 Open 0 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀
Need to understand if three are requirement to avoid extra messages or 1ms of latency
#36 opened Apr 13, 2022 by lindadunbar
Consider not to load underlay network with application details.
#35 opened Apr 12, 2022 by CAN-IETF
It is hard to use existing work to measure the computation, but we can optimize the latency through the performance monitoring. We have performance/measurement matrix over there.
#34 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Regarding the flow affinity, is it from network perspective or from application/computation perspective?
#33 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
How to effectively compute paths? Shall we put CPUs into account?
#32 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
For Dyncast, when the time is short, is it possible for the router to decide the routing? It is too fast.
#31 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
We have multiple upper layer application. Do we have additional needs for routing(e.g. WG?) or we are using those applications and won't need such new WG?
#30 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Is dyncast proposed to encapsulate?
#29 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Will CAN dyncast impact each and every router? How to avoid loops?
#28 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Clarifications on the computing resource, its requirements and characteristics would be helpful.
#27 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
What's the assumed scale of a D-router? 10 ^ 6 sessions? 100^ 8? What's the assumed update rate? !Gb? 1Tb?
#26 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
What happens when the user moves? If so we also need to move application context.
#25 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
It can only move the services around as fast as it can update the routing plane. which comes back to the point about service discovery (waiting for convergence/distribution as opposed to just updating the SD server)
#24 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
It needs application information too, so it can't just make a decision at the network layer.
#23 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
The LB as part of the application itself is superior (part of the distributed application itself is to obtain and keep updating the "best" unicast location to use).
#22 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
This is not striked as a routing problem; it's all service discovery that can be done in higher layers.
#21 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
3GPP and URSP solve this based on UPF selection. It uses both endpoint + application.
#20 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
One overlay plane per application. Resources/metric specific to the plane.
#19 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
The point is that we need a standardized LB protocol
#18 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Whether the interests of the organization deploying the application and the organization providing the network connectivity are aligned. Google doesn't worry about this because they are both.
#17 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
How does the application layer or the transport layer learn the network status to steering traffic?
#16 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
It seems impossible to satisfy that requirement simultaneously with the latency requirement.
#15 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
Each application may have a different definition of "resources" these then have to be boiled down into a single topology Network Aware Computing (NAC! :) does scale
#14 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
It wasn't clear that how hard of a requirement session persistence is.
#13 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
If there is anything missing from current lbs that would prevent their use as-is? other than there is for market reasons no interop standard between different lbs?
#12 opened Apr 9, 2022 by CAN-IETF
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.