From 64f4590443699fb6c4888947862a920d2f0ff850 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mwilliams <mwilliams@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:06:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Fix] Fix TestMissingAbstractMethodImpl

Summary:
My previous fix for nemo broke one of the QuickTests, that was expecting a
CodeError even in the presence of redeclared base classes.

I've changed the test so that we shouldnt generate a error, and made it check
for that.

Test Plan: fast_tests

Reviewers: qigao, myang

Reviewed By: qigao

CC: ps, mwilliams, qigao

Differential Revision: 341490
---
 src/test/test_code_error.cpp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/test/test_code_error.cpp b/src/test/test_code_error.cpp
index 9b947c5f2e334..25c11439ad6e2 100644
--- a/src/test/test_code_error.cpp
+++ b/src/test/test_code_error.cpp
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ bool TestCodeError::TestMissingAbstractMethodImpl() {
      "}"
      "class B implements A {"
      "}");
-  VE(MissingAbstractMethodImpl,
+  VEN(MissingAbstractMethodImpl,
      "<?php "
      "if (true) {"
      "  abstract class A {"
@@ -382,7 +382,6 @@ bool TestCodeError::TestMissingAbstractMethodImpl() {
      "  }"
      "} else {"
      "  abstract class A {"
-     "    abstract function foo();"
      "  }"
      "}"
      "class B extends A {"