-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DDLm rationalisation #188
DDLm rationalisation #188
Conversation
Explain meaning of '.' for data name deprecation
Deprecate xref datanames
Removal of unused element indeed makes the dictionary more readable and easier to understand. However, I do have several notes:
|
|
Great, thank you for the recent changes. It was a bit unexpected to see that multidimensional arrays are supported by the DDLm (i.e. the The human-readable definitions of the I have filled a separate issue (#189) for the |
_category.key_id
Yes @vaitkus you are correct about the differences between the Array and Matrix types. Thank you for raising #189 . I have just added to the pull request by removing |
Thank you for the answer. I have tried validating the latests version of the DDLm dictionary against itself and discovered the following additional issues:
|
CATEGORY_KEY in dictionary_valid.
I have updated the pull request to take into account the items @vaitkus has noted. |
A number of items are obsolete in DDLm:
If these changes are considered significant enough, we should change the major version number to 4.0. Please comment on this.