Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any Ref about the MCEP post-processing ? #241

Closed
gillesdegottex opened this issue Sep 18, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Any Ref about the MCEP post-processing ? #241

gillesdegottex opened this issue Sep 18, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@gillesdegottex
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

Does anybody has any bibliographic reference about the post-processing used in Merlin ?

Starting at

run_process('{line} | {x2x} +af > {weight}'

I dare saying the SPTK code is a bit cryptic.

@ronanki
Copy link
Member

ronanki commented Sep 18, 2017

I believe @zhizhengwu wrote this piece of code -- he might have some reference. I once had it, but can't find now.

@bajibabu
Copy link
Contributor

This might be helpful #38

@ljuvela
Copy link

ljuvela commented Sep 18, 2017

The main idea seems to be multiplying the MGC coefficients, excluding c(0) and c(1), with some post-filtering constant.

I think the post-filter is similar to what Takaki et al. used in their recent paper:
http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/Interspeech_2017/pdfs/0488.PDF

Both that and Baji's reference point to this paper:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/479266/

@zhizhengwu
Copy link
Collaborator

@gillesdegottex
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot guys! (and sorry for the duplicate ...)

The HTML link is dead though.
I'll have a look at Takaki's

@chazo1994
Copy link

I see some confusion, in the paper referenced by @zhizhengwu, they describe a postfilter on Mel frequency cepstral coefficients but in your code (in generate.py), the input file mgc is Mel generalized cepstral coenficients. So I think, it have a bit differences.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants