Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CAHC: need newer version of docker due to SELinux problems #178

Closed
miabbott opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

CAHC: need newer version of docker due to SELinux problems #178

miabbott opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@miabbott
Copy link
Contributor

miabbott commented Nov 23, 2016

Recent composes of CAHC have this error in the logs:

libsemanage.semanage_direct_install_info: Overriding docker module at lower priority 100 with module at priority 400.
15:13:49 Re-declaration of boolean virt_sandbox_use_fusefs
15:13:49 Failed to create node
15:13:49 Bad boolean declaration at /etc/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/virt/cil:159
15:13:49 /usr/sbin/semodule:  Failed!

This seems to arise from the version of selinux-policy-targeted that is being pulled in from the CentOS-CR repo.

@cgwalters suggested on IRC to use a newer version of docker to mitigate this.

Not sure which version to use...maybe something from projectatomic/docker?

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Alternatively we might be able to drop out the virt-sig docker in favor of the Core rebuild.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately, we can't easily do that as there's no repos for extras/rhel-atomic-rebuild that I'm aware of that use CR. I could do it of course, but CentOS will need to do it anyways, so we should ping them.

@jasonbrooks
Copy link
Collaborator

May not be worth messing w/ any further, but I did a test build w/ these excludes: #182

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

This is fixed (for now anyways).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants