New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Discussion] Use a Bytecode pattern instead of Syntax Tree for the VM #266

Closed
define-private-public opened this Issue Apr 20, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@define-private-public

define-private-public commented Apr 20, 2016

Rather than posting an issue, I'd like to have a discussion on the feasibility of switching ChaiScript from a Syntax Tree based evaluation over to a ByteCode pattern. The main reason behind this would be performance. What would need to be done for ChaiScript to use this under the hood.

@lefticus

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lefticus

lefticus Apr 20, 2016

Member

I have moved this conversation over to the discourse site: http://discourse.chaiscript.com/t/moving-to-a-bytecode-representation/186

Member

lefticus commented Apr 20, 2016

I have moved this conversation over to the discourse site: http://discourse.chaiscript.com/t/moving-to-a-bytecode-representation/186

@lefticus lefticus closed this Apr 20, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment