Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upHalf of existing gear became "too big" after merging PR 28123 #30410
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
XhameX
commented
May 11, 2019
|
I have the same problem as of #28123 PR and it's really annoying. To Reproduce And much more. Expected behavior Versions and configuration(please complete the following information):
This is my first time writing here and if should make a new issue post about this and delete this one let me know. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I have this problem too, it happens with a lot of clothes and gear. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
It seem to happen to every items considered big enough to accommodate to large mutations. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I checked doc and json and code i think it come from recent code addition in 70a8c03 Regarding code it may be change on how oversize works and json may not have been adapted. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
My apologies. I will look into this very soon. This comes from a change in the aforementioned PR around how we handle OVERSIZED gear and what FITS means. I will be sure to add a unit test of some kind to check for these cases |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Well, i though a bout it an i was wondering if it was intended. Cause when you see a blanket being 'too big' and the overzised definition it was quite logical. May be it could be kept like that and add a 'larger' tag for the old oversized ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Looking over the discussion history of the pull request in question ( #28123 ) it seems like the core problem here is a disconnect over the intent of the "oversized" flag. The game had the assumption that "oversized" meant "can be worn by normal sized players or large players" approximately equally well, and it appears that @MetroidHunter was attempting to change that definition. It was pretty clear from kevin's comments here that he did not receive the understanding that the definition was being changed intentionally (and honestly I couldn't pull that understanding out of the PR description myself, I only realized it after the fact while looking through the discussion). So when kevin asked for the additional encumbrance penalty to be removed, metroidhunter complied, but did not walk back any of the other UI changes that went along with metroidhunter's revised definition of the term. |
Feuerhai
referenced this issue
May 24, 2019
Closed
Oversized flag naming change in description #30788
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This is 100% correct |

dom4op commentedMay 11, 2019
•
edited
Describe the bug
Stuff like holsters, sheathes, canteens now have "too big" added to their names. Even those which I make from scratch and supposedly for myself are "too big". There is no encumbrance penalty, it's just mildly irritating to see stuff like "pair of binoculars (too big)".
Link to PR in question: #28123
To Reproduce
Craft a holster/sheath/canteen. It's too big.
Expected behavior
Would be great if there wasn't "too big" mark on gear that actually fits.
Screenshots
https://i.imgur.com/J9bZni2.jpg
Versions and configuration(please complete the following information):