Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New item descriptions - round 1 #10303

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@ghost
Copy link

commented Dec 2, 2014

New descriptions for the RM42, tanto, machete, kukri and L2037.

@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@
"color": "light_gray",
"name": "L2037 Backup",
"name_plural": "L2037 Backups",
"description": "The companion sidearm for the L523 modular system, this beast of an autorevolver has ups and downs. Unfortunately, it only chambers five rounds. Fortunately, they're the same as those used in the L523: .223. (Or in military hands, 5.56.)",
"description": "Developed by Leadworks as a companion sidearm to the L523, this massive autorevolver fires the powerful .223 round, but suffers high recoil as a result. It has a weighted barrel to make recoil more manageable and a 5-chamber cylinder.",

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@KA101

KA101 Dec 2, 2014

Contributor

L523 is a system, not one weapon.

@KA101

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Dec 2, 2014

I think the descriptions are fine as-is. Why the need to change them?

@boydkr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Dec 2, 2014

I kinda like the existing descriptions

SpongeTheGlaive SpongeTheGlaive
@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Dec 3, 2014

@KA101 Mainly to make weapons easier to visualize.

@kevingranade

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Dec 3, 2014

I'm not seeing an improvement either, just changes.

@KA101

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Dec 5, 2014

Yeah, this is a case of "PR exceeds the previously discussed spec and therefore gains more opposition than anticipated". Closing with leave to re-file the L2037 change as it is here, which I'll punch through.

@KA101 KA101 closed this Dec 5, 2014

@ghost ghost deleted the item-descriptions branch Dec 6, 2014

@ghost ghost referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2014

Merged

New L2037 description #10354

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.