Buffed .50 BMG

[BorkBorkGoesTheCode]

It's now competitive with the .300 WinMag, and it's closer to reality.

[mugling]

I'm not sure this is a good idea from a gameplay POV considering how available 50BMG is versus 300 (think belts on vehicles).

[BorkBorkGoesTheCode]

I just realized the .50 has 700 recoil. That is waaay to low. I'm testing a change.

[mugling]

As above and in #19042 - we should determine what we are trying to achieve before we make ad-hoc adjustments

[DavidROwen]

The .50 BMG is in an almost completely different class from the .300 WinMag, at least as far as damage goes. .50 hits much harder. The ballistic performance is 3850-4100ft·lbf for the .300 WinMag and 13050-15000ft·lbf for the .50.

Theoretically, .300 should be more common outside of army drops. Pretty much every gun store IRL will have it.

[mugling]

As above and in #19042 - we should determine what we are trying to achieve before we make ad-hoc adjustments

[BorkBorkGoesTheCode]

Please close unwanted PRs if you have no intention to merge them. It saves contributor time.

[BorkBorkGoesTheCode]

Until you complete your project of removing the joule-to damage system from the game, the damage dealt by the 50 BMG remains an outstanding bug. This PR brought 50 BMG damage in line with GAME_BALANCE.md and had no code issues, yet you closed it.

[mugling]

The route your taking with this multitude of PR's is needlessly time consuming versus any tangible benefit. We should be focusing development time on other more significant issues

[BorkBorkGoesTheCode]

Dude, you complained about unreviewable PRs, then stopped reading PR contents in favor of the summary.

[DracoGriffin]

@BorkBorkGoesTheCode if you'd like to complete this PR, I can re-open it for you. It was discovered by a user on Discord:

[Dynamic] MP7A1 Today at 11:44 AM
Huh. Looking at GAME_BALANCE.md, it looks like .50 BMG damage is massively lower than it should be.

And looks like this PR was attempting to resolve that bug.

Please let me know, thanks.