Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upCooked Acorns calorie #29050
Conversation
Fris0uman
added some commits
Mar 27, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.cataclysmdda.org/t/acorns-the-super-food/19404/34 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
There's no need to change the calories manually, you can just remove the |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
So I remove the calorie and the flag entry ? |
KorGgenT
added
Food / Vitamins
[JSON]
labels
Mar 27, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
It still needs the calorie entry, but if you remove the flag, it will inherit it's calorie value from what it's made from. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Ok done, I removed the flag. |
ZhilkinSerg
merged commit 8e3072b
into
CleverRaven:master
Mar 27, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
The weight needs to be fixed now as well 30g of Acorns should not turn into 118g without adding anything to them, also acorn meal has according to a quick google search around 500 kcal per 100g and not around 100. Seems more like the problem was not that the result had too many calories but that too few acorns where required to craft them. |
Fris0uman
deleted the
Fris0uman:acorn
branch
Mar 28, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Ok let's go back to the forum discussion because my research did not deliver the same results. |
Fris0uman commentedMar 27, 2019
Summary
SUMMARY: Balance "Cooked Acorns get same calorie value as Acorns instead of 8 times more"Purpose of change
Cooked acorns recipe use 1 charge of acorns but has 456 ca instead of 114 ca and two portions.
Describe the solution
This changes the calorie value to 114 ca and the charges to 1.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Forum discussion that brought the problem up.