Try out bigger inline threshold in clang release #15577
Closed
Conversation
|
Nothing interesting, let's try out experimental-new-pass-manager |
|
ThinLTO: 0.5% |
|
4% will pay for 7 minutes and +450 MB binary size :) |
|
PS. I cannot understand the reason for MSan error :( |
100% unrelated flap |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en
Changelog category (leave one):
Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
Try out clang inline threshold 1000
Detailed description / Documentation draft:
Let's try out inline threshold 1000 to see the binary size, compilation times and performance gains. Also it might show some places where inlining is crucial and we can manually write force inlines.