Shadow lambda arguments #27235
Merged
Shadow lambda arguments #27235
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In case of ambiguity, lambda functions should prefer its arguments to other aliases or identifiers
robot-clickhouse
added
the
pr-bugfix
Be a good citizen and leave a test checking for the recovery after the lambda function has been processed
vdimir
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2021
This was referenced Aug 6, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en
Changelog category (leave one):
Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
In case of ambiguity, lambda functions prefer its arguments to other aliases or identifiers
Detailed description / Documentation draft:
Tagging this as a bug because it's behaviour wasn't what's documented (#23194), but feel free to change it to an improvement if you think it should be treated as such.
Closes #5046