fix: added model name to the return response

[sauravpanda]

PR Description

This pull request aims to address the issue of missing model name in the return response. The changes involve adding the 'model_name' attribute to the return response in the 'review_pull_request' and 'generate_pull_request_desc' functions within the 'code_review.py' file.

Significant Modifications

• Added 'model_name' attribute to the return response in 'review_pull_request' and 'generate_pull_request_desc' functions.

Motivation

The motivation behind these changes is to ensure that the model name is included in the return response, providing more comprehensive and informative data for the users and improving the overall functionality and usability of the code.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description

None

[kaizen-bot]

Code Review Feedback

Code Quality

Unused imports should be removed

Reason

The 'class ReviewOutput' and 'class DescOutput' have an unused import 'model_name'. It should be removed to maintain code cleanliness.

Confidence

moderate

Potential Issues

Potential missing error handling

Reason

The addition of 'model_name' attribute in 'ReviewOutput' and 'DescOutput' classes lacks error handling for potential failures when accessing 'self.provider.model'. Consider adding appropriate error handling to handle potential failures.

Confidence

important

Improvements

Consistent naming convention

Reason

The naming convention for the 'model_name' attribute should be consistent across classes. Consider using a uniform naming convention to improve code readability and maintainability.

Confidence

moderate

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️