Skip to content

Conversation

@sauravpanda
Copy link
Member

@sauravpanda sauravpanda commented May 29, 2024

Pull Request Description: fix: updated messaging for kaizen bot

Summary

This pull request aims to update the messaging format used by the Kaizen bot to improve clarity and user experience. The changes primarily focus on modifying the output templates and the review status messages.

Significant Modifications

  1. Output Template Update:

    • The PR_COLLAPSIBLE_TEMPLATE in kaizen/helpers/output.py has been updated to enhance readability.
    • The summary line now includes a newline character (\n) and the label **Potential Solution:** for better clarity.
    • Additional newlines have been added for improved formatting.
  2. Review Status Messaging:

    • In kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py, the logic for generating the review status message has been refactored.
    • The status message is now stored in a variable status_msg and concatenated with the markdown_title and markdown_output for a cleaner and more maintainable code structure.
    • The conditional logic for determining the review status message has been simplified.

These changes are intended to make the bot's feedback more user-friendly and the codebase easier to maintain.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description None

@sauravpanda sauravpanda linked an issue May 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@kaizen-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented May 29, 2024

Code Review

Code Quality

[moderate] -> Inconsistent indentation can make the code harder to read and maintain. kaizen/helpers/output.py | 3 - 3
[important] -> Unused variables should be removed to keep the codebase clean and maintainable. kaizen/helpers/output.py | 2 - 2
[moderate] -> Inconsistent use of comments can lead to confusion and should be standardized. kaizen/helpers/output.py | 16 - 16
[important] -> Inconsistent variable naming can make the code harder to understand and maintain. kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 13 - 13

Potential Issues

[moderate] -> Unused variables should be removed to avoid confusion and potential bugs. kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 20 - 20

Improvements

[important] -> Inconsistent use of status messages can lead to confusion and should be standardized. kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 17 - 29

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

@cloudcodeai-nightly
Copy link

Code Review

✅ This is a good review! 👍

Here are some feedback:

Code Quality

[important] -> The variable `status_msg` is introduced but not used consistently. This can lead to confusion and reduce code readability. **Fix:** Ensure `status_msg` is used consistently throughout the function to maintain clarity. kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 8 - 8

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit 48fa1f7 into main May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

update review messaging

2 participants