Skip to content

Conversation

@sauravpanda
Copy link
Member

@sauravpanda sauravpanda commented May 31, 2024

Pull Request Description

Title: fix: flake8 issues fixed

Summary:
This pull request addresses and resolves various flake8 issues in the kaizen/llms/provider.py and tests/llms/test_provider.py files. The main purpose of these changes is to improve code quality and maintainability by adhering to PEP 8 standards.

Significant Modifications:

  1. Code Formatting:
    • In kaizen/llms/provider.py, the multiline function call to litellm.completion has been refactored into a single line to comply with flake8 formatting rules.
    • In tests/llms/test_provider.py, the import statement for Mock from unittest.mock has been removed as it was unused, and the assertion assert response != None has been corrected to assert response is not None to follow PEP 8 guidelines.

Refactoring:

  • The changes primarily involve minor refactoring to ensure the codebase adheres to flake8 standards, improving readability and maintainability.

These modifications do not introduce new features or change the existing functionality but ensure that the code is clean and follows best practices.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description None

@kaizen-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented May 31, 2024

Code Review

✅ This is a good review! 👍

Here are some feedback:

Code Quality

[important] -> The assertion `assert response != None` was changed to `assert response is not None`, which is more Pythonic and improves code readability. **Fix:** No action needed; this change is appropriate. tests/llms/test_provider.py | 8 - 8
[important] -> Added an assertion to check that `usage` is not None, which improves test coverage and ensures that the `usage` variable is properly validated. **Fix:** No action needed; this change is appropriate. tests/llms/test_provider.py | 9 - 9

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit f8cffc2 into main May 31, 2024
@cloudcodeai-nightly
Copy link

Code Review

✅ This is a good review! 👍

Here are some feedback:

Code Quality

[important] -> The assertion `assert response != None` has been changed to `assert response is not None`. This is a more Pythonic way to check for `None` values. **Fix:** No action needed. tests/llms/test_provider.py | 36 - 36
[important] -> The assertion `assert usage is not None` has been added. This improves the test by ensuring that the `usage` variable is also checked for `None` values. **Fix:** No action needed. tests/llms/test_provider.py | 37 - 37

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

@cloudcodeai-nightly
Copy link

Code Review

✅ All Clear: This PR is ready to merge! 👍

Code Quality

[important] -> The assertion `assert response != None` has been changed to `assert response is not None`. This is a good practice as it is more Pythonic and clear. |

Potential Solution:: No action needed.

tests/llms/test_provider.py | 37 - 37

[important] -> The assertion `assert usage is not None` has been added. This is a good addition to ensure that the `usage` variable is not `None`. |

Potential Solution:: No action needed.

tests/llms/test_provider.py | 38 - 38

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants