-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
module #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
module #2
Conversation
|
CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR. |
| required: false | ||
| default: 'https://github.com' | ||
| module: | ||
| description: 'Module name for monorepo setups (optional)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: Clarify the module input description to indicate expected format (name or path) and that leaving it empty will skip sending the module flag to the script. [enhancement]
Severity Level: Minor
| description: 'Module name for monorepo setups (optional)' | |
| description: 'Module name or path for monorepo setups (optional). Leave empty to skip sending the module flag to the upload script.' |
Why it matters? ⭐
This is a harmless documentation improvement that clarifies expected input format and behavior when left empty. It reduces confusion for action consumers and matches the optional nature of the input added by the PR.
Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
<code>This is a comment left during a code review.
**Path:** action.yml
**Line:** 30:30
**Comment:**
*Enhancement: Clarify the `module` input description to indicate expected format (name or path) and that leaving it empty will skip sending the module flag to the script.
Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.| -b "$BRANCH" \ | ||
| -u "$BASE_URL" | ||
| -u "$BASE_URL" \ | ||
| -m "$MODULE" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: Only pass the module flag to the script when MODULE is non-empty to avoid sending an empty value to the upload script; conditionally emit the -m argument in the multi-line command. [possible issue]
Severity Level: Minor
| -m "$MODULE" | |
| $(if [ -n "$MODULE" ]; then printf ' -m "%s"\n' "$MODULE"; fi) |
Why it matters? ⭐
Passing an empty module value may cause the upload script to receive an empty argument (or a -m with an empty string), which can change script behavior or cause unexpected parsing. Conditionally emitting the -m flag prevents that potential class of errors. The suggested change is actionable and directly improves robustness of the CI step.
Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
<code>This is a comment left during a code review.
**Path:** action.yml
**Line:** 77:77
**Comment:**
*Possible Issue: Only pass the module flag to the script when `MODULE` is non-empty to avoid sending an empty value to the upload script; conditionally emit the `-m` argument in the multi-line command.
Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
Pull Request Feedback 🔍
|
| BASE_URL: ${{ inputs.base_url }} | ||
| MODULE: ${{ inputs.module }} | ||
| run: | | ||
| bash upload_coverage.sh \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: Only pass the -m flag to the upload script when inputs.module is non-empty by building the extra args in the run script and conditionally appending -m "$MODULE". [possible bug]
|
CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR. |
CodeAnt-AI Description
Add optional 'module' input so monorepo users can upload coverage for a specific package
What Changed
Impact
✅ Per-module coverage uploads for monorepos✅ Fewer incorrect coverage reports when using monorepos✅ Existing single-repo workflows remain unaffected💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Example
Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt
You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:
This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.
Example
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.